Some people never learn. #Bitcoin only.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1080x1967&blurhash=%5D27w%3F0_MM%5ExuMx-%3ANFoxW.s.ROs-xtV%40xt4URQ%252RQxartVunQaMso8%7BMy%24%2BRQxas%3BM%7DnmWEof9YR%25%25LWBofTHJPScNtbb&x=710c4125730b1e56f2fb7dd3a24de358cf7df6b4ebd115d97be70c0ad26a6048
Hahah I just saw that same post. Noice
Good
Way to be, jimmybirch
Which was surprising, since this was from the cryptocurrency subreddit 😂
I did x but should I do x agian? Fucking madness
Degens gonna degen
LOL
Reminds me of my own shitcoining days
Spoiler alert: AI does not need a coin.
Where is Corn’s “Bitcoin you dumb fuck” meme when you need it!?
I was going to reply with that image 😂
🤣 It’s currently on display at nostr:npub1key55ax33gkl50uqemvl4khrtqrhzm7wzpc7fhseutt5ddkcwcrqgxlt3h 💜
🔥 exactly where it should be
Quickly becoming our most popular attraction.
@note13jqqpwyj9gvevx7d67rxv6367t2mcuh5rwfehx0z22tl6qmvdczsh2rt08
👀🫂
nostr:npub1key55ax33gkl50uqemvl4khrtqrhzm7wzpc7fhseutt5ddkcwcrqgxlt3h what’s nostr:npub1lrnvvs6z78s9yjqxxr38uyqkmn34lsaxznnqgd877j4z2qej3j5s09qnw5 zap split royalty?
This could be a world first innovation for artists and art galleries such as Pubkey.
🤯
“Mom, I got my first meme royalties.” 🥲🤣
nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z how might we NIP meme royalties into reality and ensure nostr memes its way to victory?
This is going to require some standardization since clients don’t all support this feature.
What's meme royalties? a zap split? With NIP-96 we can search by the hash of pictures and pay the normal zap split in the original post. Is that it?
Yes - zap split/other mechanism designed to reward the meme creator.
The thought was sparked by Pubkey’s corndalorian framed meme.
Corndalorian can be zapped by someone in person. Maybe the physical space/pubkey gets a portion as well. Some mechanism leads to a nostr discussion of the OP.
Specifically on NIP-96 - is there consensus, or criticism of this approach?
Many clients support NIP 96. It's just a standard way to upload images/videos based on the hash of the content. Nostr.build and nostrcheck.me also support it.
Then, to make this work, we create a NIP94 to define the owner of the image and add the appropriate zap split as defined in NIP 57. When people reuse the image, we can search for the NIP-94, get the zap split and pay the owner directly.
I love this line of thinking 🔥🔥🔥
🤣 solid ⚡️🧡💯
the fallacy of "there is no risk in investing at least 1% of your portfolio in this or that"
... well if i put 1% in 100 crappy projects i will end up with nothing...
