If this is communism yes this is part of my belief system :
Communism is a political and economic ideology that advocates for the collective ownership of property, the abolition of private ownership, and a classless society where resources and means of production are controlled by the community or the state. It aims to eliminate social and economic inequalities by distributing wealth and resources based on need rather than market forces.
Who is "the comunity"? How are you going to decide who needs what or how much in order to distribute the resources without "inequalities"? What does "inequality" means?
Its a theory, its kinda like the theory of decentralization right? I like the tribal system for enactment of such policy
Tribal system works for tribes, meaning an extreamly small amount of people. And then, what happens when one tribe has to interact with the next one?
And about the first sentence, yes, it is a theory proven wrong once and again, and again, and again...
If you are open to question your believes I recomend you to read "the fatal conceit" by Hayek
Will read
Lots of great material here. Will check back in a year.😉
Thank you
It looks like you're more anarchist, not communist. Anarchism and Communism are both left, but Communism is authoritarion and Anarchism is libertarian. Anarchism see the local community and 'affinity groups' as the foundation of the social, political and economic life of humanity; not the state or the individual.
”COMMUNISM will work THIS time, because when it was tried before and failed miserably and EVERY TIME RESULTED IN MASS MURDER, it was not communism MY WAY. This time it will work” You are absolutely and utterly a fucking moron. I cannot stand people like you. Please go Fuck Yourself
Hey man are you ok? Im not in charge of anything 😂so no need to get worked up
You are an absolute moron to suggest that the mass murder ideology communism is something GOOD. Go Fuck yourself, and take your emojis with you
I'm responding to this because I find these ideas interesting and have spent over 10,000 hours studying economics and bitcoin. I promise I will not call you names even though I respectfully disagree.
I don't believe a community or state can abolish private property when the private property can be distilled into 12 secret random words.
Ironically, bitcoin does give the means of monetary production to the people, but this is a moot point given that individual people do not have equal ability. Very few people had sufficient knowledge to mine bitcoin when the block reward was 50 bitcoin every 10 minutes. Therefore, even though anybody could technically produce bitcoin blocks, very few people can.
The same is true for saving. Even if we could defy human nature with schemes such as this, it would not solve wealth inequality. Most people spend money like drunken sailors. If everyone had the same income that could not be debased or stolen, broke people would still exist because people do not have equal money management skills.
That is why I prefer capitalism with a non-socialist monetary system. The United States, contrary to popular belief, is not a capitalist economic system. It's a mixed economy where some people(banks and government) get money without doing any work aside from fudging numbers.
A bank does not **save capital** to buy a house. Banks print money to buy homes and **collect rent from HoMe OwNeRs**. It's an accounting trick, not capitalism.
Here's how capitalism works, according to the economist Russ Roberts.
You got me., attention whore 😉
I like the intention to distribute resources based on "need". The question is who/how to decide the "need"?
The idea of the "market" is simply to ask everyone how much they value and appreciate which "need" (aka price discovery). Money acts as an honest communication signal to collectively decide where to allocate resources.
That being said, we've yet to experience a truely *free* market with a truely *honest* money.
