GN 🌙🫂🧙‍♂️ así es

I don't know what this means... The term illegal is short hand for someone who illegally immigrated. I don't know anyone who would consider another person "illegal"

Bro i blocked u like 4 years ago on twitter lmfao nAtIoNs aRe pRiVaTe PrOpERtY byeeeeee

If nations are made up of individuals owning their own land then who's property is this nation as a whole? "...There are then only two alterna-

tives: either (1) a certain class of people, A, have the right to own another class, B; or (2) everyone has the right to own his own equal quotal share of everyone else The first alternative implies that while Class A deserves the rights of being human, Class B is in reality subhuman and therefore deserves no such rights.

...The second alternative, what we might call “participatory communalism” or “communism,” holds that every man should have the right to own his equal quotal share of every-one else."

-Murray N. Rothbard, For A New Liberty

I suppose what I am asking is are you infact a statist or a communist?

3) she is one

Mass immigration is a psyop to push surveillance so I better comply with the narrative is an incredible way of reasoning there my guy 👍

Liberal white women who so not believe in ID requirements instituted after WW1 as a temporary measure over made up national security concerns

Ah yes very liberal, such white, much vagina

Yeah and keeping slaves used to be legal while freeing them was illegal.

Maybe don't get your morals and ethics from the laws of evil regimes.

Your ancestors didn't have passports when they traveled.

Borders are a new idea, created by capitalists to stop workers from fleeing to other countries by keeping them debt trapped.

Passports invented after WWI.

Passports existed for centuries, but they were not used widely to control movement until the early 20th century.

Before the 19th century, travel documents were rare, informal, and selective, mainly letters of safe conduct for merchants or diplomats. Most ordinary people could cross borders without documentation.

During much of the 19th century, passport requirements actually declined, especially in Europe, as liberal ideas and new transport systems made travel easier and borders more open.

The decisive change came with World War I (1914–1918). Governments introduced mandatory passports to manage security, military conscription, and large population movements. Crucially, these wartime controls were not dismantled after the war.

In the 1920s, the League of Nations standardised passport formats and border controls, embedding them into international governance. By the mid-20th century, passports had become a universal and permanent tool for regulating international movement.

Requiring a state-issued passport to travel is essentially submission to state power though, cock sucking in other words.

When it comes to freedom of movement, the only legitimate borders are those of private property.

The problem is that the State makes these borders impossible to identify clearly, since it owns vast amounts of land itself. Moreover, it is not accountable to the actual property owners when it welcomes people (using stolen money to do so), while the consequences affect the private property of those citizens.

I think they meant this.

What's your address?

I hear the Sentinelese are soliciting new members.

The issue isn't traveling, but that they come expecting Government handouts. Their children will be raised on food stamps and develop the same socialist ideologies they came here to escape from.

You are not the owner of the borders. You should to be the owner of the your property borders, maybe even not are.

Be quiet, comrade. Go back to your hole where you came from