I need some help understanding what is being said here...
Discussion
He's saying institutional ETF investors will oppose changing bitcoin in ways that displease their masters.
He also got more downvotes than upvotes. This man used to be the most important voice in bitcoin.
Fidelity is funding Bitcoin development. Maybe he is right
$boost
Lol.. the Owners and Users of Actual #Bitcoin will oppose changing Bitcoin in any way that displeases THEM!
Especially the node operators like me. This is the power of Open Source. I don't like the scammy, abusive crap that's been going on lately.
Fortunately, neither do many of us. We have the power to edit, modify and change the code. And that's what we're doing.
If I have anything to say about it. The code will be so pure and tight Again! that scammers will continue to shit their pants..😠🧡😊🦍
Are you a bitcoin core contributor?
$boost
I don't understand your question. Bitcoin is Open Source. We're all #Bitcoin. We're all Bitcoin's developers.
Especially virtuous full nodes, and Bitcoin loyalist. Are you asking do I know how to code? Yes, long before you were born.
But #Satoshi already wrote the #code. All we have to do is not break it lol..🧡😊🦍
you sound like an ai bot
I don't see what's wrong about that perspective. Once financial institutions come into the picture the game gets more complex.
The last contentious fork was pushed by big money players. They threw money around to influence the fork, IMO in a naive way, and lost bigly. How will it play out when big money is 10x or 100x bigger and more sophisticated?
It's an important concern. Not sure what can be done but not considering this possibility is definitely a mistake.
Okay that's very well said. I haven't thought about it all that much thought I don't think the bitcoin community as a whole is ready for something like this.
See my post below..🧡😊🦍