Compromised Core devs deliberately allowed inscription spam, retard.
Discussion
You’re like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and demands to know what’s going on.
I know what is going on. You are telling lies and trying to manipulate people. As you can see I give the direct evidence.
Not sure if you are a retard who is brainwashed by compromised Core devs' propaganda or you are a bad actor too ....
It seems like you have no idea what any of this is about. Cultist conspiracy bro following a deranged statist lunatic.
I guess you are more retard than a bad actor.
You need to study Bitcoin more and inform yourself how compromised Core devs allowed inscription spam and then used this "argument that spam already exist or spam can not be stopped" to push more spam via OP_RETRUN
I guess you prefer more centralized mining.
You are fighting against the fundamental mechanics of how the network operates. Of people value a transaction they will pay for it and nothing your node does will stop this.
This is the nature of a censorship resistant network powered by greed and self interest.
More retarded propaganda and nonsense from you? I am not surprised.
1. Filters work. That is why MARA stopped mining transactions with 0.1sat/vB fees.

2. Ocean is fixing centralized mining with DATUM - Decentralized Alternative Templates for Universal Mining
"DATUM was born out of a need to restore Bitcoin mining to its decentralized roots—a time when miners truly embodied the role of building the blockchain by constructing block templates and submitting them to the network."
1. You don’t understand incentives. Not mining low cost transactions has nothing to do with mining higher fee “spam”.
2. Datum won’t solve for miners who specifically choose to mine spam because they want to make more money. All datum does is make sure miners have better control over what they include in their blocks regardless of what the pool would want. A pool of miners who want to mine garbage for the money will outcompete all other miners. Your solution just accelerates the issue.
1. Hard for you to read? I am not surprised.
"Fees + filters are better than just fees."
2. See again what Mara did. Nodes secure Bitcoin, their mempool policies and their consensus.
Nodes are run by individuals and the node mempool policy of the majority cannot stop a minority from mining a valid transaction. This is the fundamental nature of a censorship resistant network.
We will filter spam and csam with Bitcoin Knots as much as we can to keep Bitcoin Freedom Money and we won't care about retards, bad actors or their wrong points of view. Your theory will be put to the test 🤙 And we know there always will be bad actors. But Bitcoin is designed to incentivize good actors.
Bitcoin is designed to incentivize self interest. I would generally agree that bitcoin creates environments for long term thinking, the competitive low margin nature of mining will continuously create environments for immediate profit motives to outweigh the long term health of the chain.
It’s a free network. So run the node you want, just remember that freedom cuts both ways.
Your rhetorical style besides being childish and cultish, is so dripping with self righteous fervor that I think it will be a net negative for Bitcoin regardless of how these node wars ultimately turn out.
Somebody put the word "cult" in your brain and you repeat it like a complete retard.
>freedom cuts both ways
You tried to say something?