Thank you for starting all this bullshit🫡
Discussion
Quadrupling down on womanly argument tactics.
You aren't capable of articulating a point correctly so you resort to gaslighting and passive aggression.
There are other ways to vent your anger. Social media is never a good way to do so.
nostr:npub1q6ya7kz84rfnw6yjmg5kyttuplwpauv43a9ug3cajztx4g0v48eqhtt3sh and I have explained our points in a sensible manner. So stop.
More gaslighting.
I'm clearly only talking to you.
You have not explained your points in a sensible manner and then when challenged on them you resort to gaslighting.
I'm not angry at all. You're just arguing like a woman.
And now you're just being dumb, too.
I really don't give a shit what either of you think.
That seems to not be the case, or you wouldn't spend so much time arguing.
I care just enough to keep this up for two reasons:
1. I am an idiot that loves this kind of argument.
2. You are providing enough entertainment to make me giggle the whole time, at least after you started to not make cogent points.
You have no idea what my motives are. I really couldn't possibly care less what you think.
You can scroll back in my posts where I outright make my motives known.
This is my art and I want to be alienated for my art.
I forgive you for being beholden to systems of oppression like the ideals of "equality" and the notions of mortal justice.
Well, I don't derive my morals on my own. They are pretty rooted in The Bible, though I am learning to slough off a lot of the grosser metaphysical secular modernist mumbojumbo that most in the US have been steeped in without knowing or understanding it.
But, if you wanna get into it, I am very curious as to how you think that equality under the law is oppressive. Either mortal or immortal justice. I can discuss both pretty well, I think.
The irony of your name calling while claiming others can't make a solid argument.
Oh now a woman has appeared to incorrectly assess the situation at hand. Shocking.
Oh, look! A misogynist has appeared to mock someone making cogent points.
You went full retard, my dude. Wow.
WOW!
I fucking hate misogynists. His argumemt is pathetic. nostr:npub1m4ny6hjqzepn4rxknuq94c2gpqzr29ufkkw7ttcxyak7v43n6vvsajc2jl please put this asshole on his place.
"Send in the troops!"
K.
It's Nostr. If I put misogynists in their place, I'd never be done.
Nice Haiku
No one would. There isn't enough time. LOL!
So it's inherently misogynistic to insult a woman? Is it inherently misandrist to insult a man? Why or why not?
> More woman behavior
This is the part I didn't really appreciate. The word "woman" isn't a perjorative.
Otherwise, go back to verbally bashing each other's heads in. You all seemed to be enjoying it and I didn't want to interrupt.
Ok would "hyper feminized" be any better in your mind? Why or why not? I'm genuinely curious.
That is better, yes, as it's a reference to specific types of behavior, rather than to all members of one sex.
Stella, as usual beat me to it.
But it amuses me when we are in sync. LOL!
How does "woman behavior" not reference "types of behavior?"
Woman is the descriptor.
It's not a condemnation of women it's a condemnation of the behavior. Same as saying hyper feminized in my mind. But that's just difference in perception.
Yes. Because you aren't insulting all women with that, just men who are feminized.
I will totally accept that instead. Thank you for attention in this matter! 😄
The way you did it is pretty misogynistic. I insult women all the time, but I am very rarely called a misogynist except as a supposedly hurtful invective. I insult nearly everyone, so don't think you're special or anything. I mostly just bring that up because if *I* think you went to far with insults, it's probably pretty bad.
Does this position come with dental lol?
Meanwhile you're quoting a movie where a dude is doing blackface. Hilarious.
Yes. Because it is funny. And you are providing fine entertainment this day!
Don't turn you back on Q. He's gonna save you trust me bro
As for why I'm in this movie, maybe I just knew I had to represent. Cause the one good part in this movie for a black man and they gave it to Crocodile Dundee.
nostr:nprofile1qqsqdzwltpr635ehdzfd52tz947qlhq77x2c7j7yguwep9n258k2nusprdmhxue69uhk7unv0ykhyetvv9uju6tdwaskcepwv46j7qgmwaehxw309a6xsetxdaex2um59ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5hsz8rhwden5te0va5hgcmfw3skgetv9ehx7um5wgcjucm0d5hs7z7723 its like they addressed the blackface so the audience in context
This poor bastard has some personal issues that he's taking out on everyone else. So sad. I would've gave him some level of comfort if he didn't take this route.
How many logical fallacies can you count? At least 2. We could probably top it out at 5.
Is this what arguing in good faith looks like?
No. You've devolved into (pretty terrible and unfunny) ad hominems.
You're the one who is breaking a good faith discussion. 🤷♂
Oh it was good faith when your buddy was lying about what first degree murder was for the sake of exaggerating his position? That was good faith? I started the bad faith. Hmmmmm should we rewind the tape? Or should we leave it where it is so you both can feel morally superior for some odd reason?
Now you're crying victim.
You're a coward or a troll. Grow up.
"You're a coward...."
"Excuse me ma'am can you fight my battles for me?"
Same guy within three minute span of time.
I'm not a victim. I'm am a nearly professional pot-stirrer. 😁
Sure. He exaggerated. Who doesn't from time to time? You've latched on to that pretty hard. But you can't claim that about me since I've been pretty consistent that I don't think this was premeditated based on what is currently known.
I'm not morally superior. I'm simply being, IMO, consistent. I'm not even attaching any morality to a majority of my statements since that's a mess to discuss and a morass to argue.
He is my buddy, but we disagree often. But, we're still friends, or at least pretty decent faceless internet acquaintances. You pointed out his degree inconsistency. He accepted that, if you'll care to remember.
So what's your beef?
Ok so his exaggerations are excusable and mine are some egregious assault on the art of debate as a whole? The contradictions are insane.
I've latched onto that because it's clearly contradictory in the nature of both of your arguments.
You're not being consistent.
And the misogynist shit proves it. I said it to another guy that you're lambasting over his take on the entire situation. You're both just doing halo effect bullshit because it's a woman that got shot and it's plain as day.
I really don't care about any of this at all. I just want the hundred million people that are in my country that shouldn't be out. If some retarded dyke is going to park her car in the way of that and then drive toward someone trying to get them out then I mean my advice is probably going to be shoot her.
This shit has gone on long enough. I don't care that it's a woman. I don't care that she has kids.
And I certainly don't care about you guys playing white knight about some woman that would exchange your life for some cotton candy.
Yes.
Because I know him and I don't know you so I am able to overlook that based on prior history and see that he is still, IMO, mostly correct.
I don't know you. I will certainly give the benefit of the doubt to those I know before those I don't.
And you are just off into ad hominem land when you had started off with a perfectly cogent debate. it devolved into arguing and now it is personal attacks. Bro, stop. They will not work on me. I have been a keyboard warrior for far too long to be goaded or upset by that. I probably have a lower opinion of myself than you have of me. Just stahp!
How is it contradictory?
I am being so consistent it isn't even funny. Just because my foundation of my arguments is not one you would like to accept, and that multiple horrible things can be true at one time is a fact of life doesn't mean that I am inconsistent.
You calling someone a misogynist is comical. That is a perfect example of an ad hominem. I like to point that out as it is funny to me. I am certainly mocking your use of that tactic, as it should be mocked.
Hey! We agree. I am all for physical removal, so to speak. (HHH reference FTW!)
Here is another thing that sucks, but is also true: The retarded dyke has every right to protest government action she sees as incorrect. That is her right to free speech, assembly, and of association at action. She played the game badly and lost. The leftists are going to make her a sainted martyr. The right is going to make the agent a sainted hero. That story has already been crafted and disseminated. You are still missing the further point: Who set this up? For what purpose? Without asking that, you are never going to understand what is going on now and what will happen next.
I am also not white knighting her. She's a horrible woman. Period. I honestly can't stand leftist women the most. They are ugly, twisted creatures who can't even see basic facts through years of delusion being blown up by years of circle fartsniffing other leftist delusion.
But guess what? She was still human. She still had rights. You are human. I am human. We still have rights. And if I cannot stand up for a fellow human's rights, then I am not being consistent with my own beliefs. Just because you hate someone doesn't mean you are allowed to strip them of their humanity to be able to justify murder or worse. (There is always worse . . . )
You saying that kind of thing shows that you have no consistent belief, just that you want to be rid of whatever you hate. I reject that mode of being. It is awful and leads to the worst kinds of attrocities, the kind that are happening all over the world right now. It is sad to see someone decently intelligent and articulate so sucked into to political "sides" when that is the worst way in which to view the world. IMO.
"I'm consistent"
Goes on to explain in detail how and why you're biased
Ok. Don't care about the rest of the stuff you said.
My view on this situation is consistent.
My view on my friends in consistent.
My view on you has changed.
If you can't parse bias, you are not fit to have anything worth sharing with others. Everyone is biased. We are human. Bias/judgement is how we function. Applying it correctly is hard. Maybe you don't understand that.