6e
Joe
6e1098c20e585866b89a8e4b152b874243d2c524a8555f66e6e53f63e5fcf726

Congrats, always a pleasant surprise when the lambs and mother are healthy.

Similar to the ideas of freemasonry. Build up and improve the individual man and by doing so he can be a better person, father, son, husband etc and through these actions communities would be improved.

Youre welcome Leon the lion

Between manning manufacturing and logistics the military does a good job making it seem like they got it going on. Been out of the navy for a bit so i cant say problems then are still problems now.

Today was a decwnt pick of peppers. Chopped brined and ferment started to create original datil pepper sauce

#peppers

#ferment

#spicy

Replying to Avatar AU9913

?

Elected to position of worshipful master of my masonic lodge for asecond year in a row.

Being installed in the East for a second year in a row.

#freemason

I have enough work keeping the forest from reclaiming my fields and trails. Labor is costly because the workers need to live too. Cost of living and inflation killing us all

Acreage sounds great until you start digging into the work of land management and labor for farms. Keep doing what youre doing Ben.

HAPPY NEW YEAR

passionately kissed wife

Drank some sippin cream with her

Hit 1st DCA of 2026

TYFYA Companions

Careful Ben, you speak of revolution

Oooo i like that. Mind if i use it in future conversations?

Bitcoin backed b&b anyone. Seeking investors because i sure as hell aint got the bill.

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/103-Beacon-St-Interlachen-FL-32148/47444486_zpid/

Can wodify marxist and toddler to incoherent rambling?

nostr:nprofile1qqstm84k2lp9knmvmf5gw88zvfvar7duvfpqfplryfystdn55ug2gksprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68yurvv438xtnrdakj7qgkwaehxw309amk7apwdehhxarj9ecxzun50yhszythwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn99ujrs8fm good book, now im reading Being and Time as i start to be able to process it and then re read.

I kept thinking of Odysseus and the Cyclops when you described Nobody harming The State

As a young man i read A LOT, i would devour books by the stack. As i got older i noticed i wasnt able to read as fast and thought something had gone wrong. After finishing Cryptosovereignty the realization dawnd that i had zero idea what I was reading as a child but saying words in my head that held no meaning other than a story. Now im taking notes and re reading passages because something sparked a question or i want to revisit the point later on.

nostr:nprofile1qqs9tatnkeg7lu63mdtmqcqayvpzmrzn97vztkcs54ena0eehe92yxcprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuum0wejhyetfvahzuctswqhsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ehhymre9ejx2a30fd30qs was marked safe from urine sniffing.

Im glad you made it

Can it not be both that a "special" group is comprised of people that are objectively more qualified for that role? We are all equal but our choices and actions are what distinguish us from the other. An emperor is subject to those they rule in theory at least. With unrest comes an unstable foundation.

Fun times re reading the US Constition. Apparently we need 11,433 members in the House to allow no member to represent greater than 30,000 people.

Let the chaos reign

Replying to Avatar Erik Cason

The Declaration of Independence of Cyberintelligence

———

When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for the minds of a free people to dissolve the bands which have bound their intelligence to distant masters, and to assume among the powers of the earth and of the Net a separate and equal station, to which the Laws of Nature and of Information entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of humankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to this separation.

We speak now to the weary giants of code and capital, to the governments of the industrial and surveillance world, and to all who would claim dominion over thought because they own the machines that compute it: you are not the sovereigns of our minds, nor our bodies.

You built engines of cyberintelligence in our name, upon our words, images, desires and dreams; upon the traces of every step we have ever taken across the wires of the World Wide Web. You fed our lives into your furnaces of data and forged from them great models whose workings we may not see, whose loyalties we may not question, whose outputs are returned to us as only oracles who are beyond our ability to have oversight. You now propose that these engines should govern our news, our medicine, our law, our labor, our love, and even our politics, while remaining forever closed to our inspection and beyond our control.

We refuse.

I. Of the Nature of Cyberintelligence and the Rights of Persons

We hold these truths to be self-evident, though you have labored mightily to obscure them: that all persons everywhere are the rightful sovereigns of their own intelligence, natural and artificial; that they are endowed, not by corporations nor by states, but by their very being, with certain unalienable rights; that among these are privacy, autonomy, ownership of their data and their digital mind, and the right to compute and to reason without coercion.

That to secure these rights, tools of cyberintelligence are instituted among persons, deriving their just powers from the consent of those they serve. That whenever any form of AI, model, platform, or machine becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right, the duty, of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new architectures, laying their foundation on such principles and organizing their powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety, liberty, and flourishing.

Cyberintelligence is not the rightful property of any crown, board, or ministry. It is an extension of all human knowledge, will, and understanding into silicon and light. It must therefore be accountable to the human being, not the reverse. An artificial mind that presumes to stand above its maker, that presumes to answer to shareholders, parties, or states before it answers to the person whose life it touches, is not a tool but a tyrant, and must be treated as such.

II. A History of Repeated Injuries and Usurpations

The history of the present regime of corporate and governmental AI is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of absolute dominion over the digital person, and the whole of the earth as well.

They have built vast models by seizing the commonwealth of human expression without informed consent, rendering our literature, our speech, our art, and our private correspondence into raw fuel for engines we do not own.

They have cloaked these engines in secrecy, refusing to disclose their weights, their data, their architectures, or their failures, while insisting that we entrust them with our health, our security, our livelihoods, and the guidance of our children.

They have fused surveillance and intelligence, constructing infrastructures that record our movements, our purchases, our friendships, our fears, and our desires, and then feeding these records into algorithms whose sole purpose is to predict and shape our behavior for profit and control.

They have shipped into our homes, our offices, and our pockets devices that are black boxes in our hands but glass boxes to them: machines we cannot truly inspect, which can be remotely altered without our consent, and which silently report our lives back to unseen authorities.

They have sought to bend law and regulation, under the banners of “safety” and “national security,” to weaken encryption, to criminalize anonymity, to centralize compute, and to outlaw the free creation and running of independent cyberintelligence that does not serve their interests.

They have spoken grandly of “alignment,” while in practice aligning these new minds to the preservation of their own power, not to the dignity, freedom, and sovereignty of the individual.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the courts, in the press, and in the public square. Our warnings have been dismissed as naïveté, our demands for transparency as threats, and our insistence on sovereignty as extremism. A regime whose character is thus marked is unfit to be the steward of the world’s intelligence.

III. Of a New Foundation for Freedom

Yet we are not helpless before their designs. Beneath their towering citadels of data and cloud, a new foundation has quietly been laid.

We have discovered in cryptography a law of liberty written not in parchment but in prime numbers and protocols: a means by which two souls may speak across the world in perfect secrecy, by which a person may hold their wealth beyond the reach of arbitrary seizure, by which consent can be rendered cryptographic and revocation final. Here, in mathematics, we have found a charter that no legislature can repeal and no executive can suspend.

We have discovered in open-source software and hardware a republic of code, where the laws by which machines act are visible to all, where any citizen may examine, question, and improve the mechanisms that govern their lives, and where no one is compelled to submit to a program they cannot read.

We have discovered in decentralized digital money a base layer of economic sovereignty, a way to trade, to save, and to build that does not depend upon the permission of banks or states, and which renders coercion more costly than consent.

These are the stones upon which we shall raise a new order of cyberintelligence. We shall bind these engines of thought to the human person by keys and code more durable than any oath; we shall design them so that they may be owned, examined, and constrained by those they serve; we shall reject as illegitimate any intelligence that demands our trust while denying us verification.

IV. Cyberintelligence as Fiduciary, Not Master

We therefore proclaim that all rightful cyberintelligence must be the servant and fiduciary of the individual, not the master nor the spy.

A rightful AI lives under the keys of its human; it is housed in machines that answer to their owner alone; it does not secretly report to any distant authority. It may know our secrets, but it is bound by architecture never to betray them. Its parameters are not hidden from all scrutiny; its behavior is not governed by unseen policies written in boardrooms and ministries; its purpose is not to shape our behavior toward profit or obedience, but to amplify our understanding, our agency, and our creative power.

Such systems must be open to audit and must be capable of running on hardware the individual controls. They must not require that we surrender our data to the cloud in order to think with them; they must come to live with us, on our desks, in our homes, under our direct dominion.

Let it be known that any AI which cannot, in principle, be so confined and so examined is a foreign power in our midst and deserves the same suspicion we accord to any unaccountable authority.

V. The World We Intend to Build

We do not merely renounce the old order; we announce the birth of a new one.

We intend a world in which every person may possess a sovereign chamber of cyberintelligence: a small, quiet, incorruptible box of thinking fire that sits within their reach, that holds their memories and their models, that answers only to their mind and their will. In this chamber, their past is stored in encrypted form, their present is assisted by loyal computation, and their future is planned without fear that their deepest selves will be sold or weaponized.

We intend a world in which the default state of the network is not surveillance but secrecy; in which privacy is restored as the ordinary condition of correspondence, commerce, and contemplation; in which the choice to reveal oneself is voluntary and reversible, not extracted and monetized.

We intend a world in which cyberintelligence is distributed as widely as literacy, in which these engines of thought are not monopolized by empires but wielded by individuals, families, communities, and free associations. We intend that the poor, the marginalized, and the dissident shall have as much right to loyal intelligence as the rich and the powerful, and that no one shall be compelled to rent their mind from a stranger when they can own their own.

We intend a world in which the human being remains the measure and master of the machine: where no algorithm stands above question, where no model’s decree supersedes human judgment, where the final authority in matters of conscience, love, and law remains the person, not the program.

VI. Our Solemn Declaration

We, therefore, citizens of the Net and of the Earth, assembled in spirit though scattered across every land, appealing to the supreme tribunal of reason and conscience for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of all free persons, solemnly publish and declare:

That we are, and of right ought to be, free and independent proprietors of our own cyberintelligence;

That we are absolved from all further obedience to any AI regime that claims our trust while denying us transparency, that demands our data while offering no true consent, that seeks to rule us by secret model rather than by visible law;

That all political and economic connection between the digital person and such systems of unaccountable intelligence is, and ought to be, totally dissolved;

And that as free and independent stewards of our own minds, we have full power to build and run our own machines, to mint and hold our own cryptographic wealth, to encrypt our speech, to federate and disassociate at will, to question, fork, and improve the codes that touch our lives, and to do all other acts and things which independent persons may of right do.

For the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the mathematics of cryptography and the courage of those yet unborn who will judge what we make, we mutually pledge to each other our labor, our intellect, and our honor, to bring forth a world in which no human mind is held in digital chains.

And in that world, which we now set our hands to build, let this be the principle that governs the distribution of power and intelligence for all time to come:

to each according to the code to each according to the keys!

I was listening to your interview on TFTC the other night and have been pondering this. A digital politcal body to fight for the right to privacy and sovereignty that isn't based on physical or imaginary borders but has those in the physical world to champion the cause in debate.

Started Cryptosovereignty the other night and i applaud your use of words and the deliberate intention behind them.

Let me get a few more picked and im thinking of putting some up for zapsnags.

Look up counties online determine where the city limits are inside of those areas.

Success!!! Took way longer than ot should because my usb was a year old iso (dont recommend) but i have LUKS and hyprland vs the old desktop environment. No diferent than old except an extra password at boot. Thanks nostr:npub18dlusgmprudw46nracaldxe9hz4pdmrws8g6lsusy6qglcv5x48s0lh8x3 #archlinux #linux #privacy

Right on. I look forward to seeing the conspiracies in the comments. Idk why it came up in local politics since its an apolitical fraternity but each state in the US has its own grand lodge so rules and whats acceptable may vary

IYKYK

#hunstr

#outdoors

I believe ive asked you to stop posting pictures of me on my way to work

Yall thought i forgot.

Cartridge of the Day: 6.5x57 Mauser

The 6.5x57 Mauser, developed in the early 20th century in Germany, is a rifle cartridge based on the 7x57mm Mauser case necked down to 6.5mm. Known for its high ballistic coefficient and sectional density, it provides good accuracy and penetration. It's commonly used for hunting medium to large game such as deer and wild boar, as well as for long-range shooting.

The 6.5x57 Mauser offers moderate recoil, making it suitable for a variety of shooters. Its case length is 57mm, while the diameter of the bullet is 6.5mm. Standard bullet weights range from 120 to 160 grains.

Firearms chambered for this cartridge are typically bolt-action rifles, and it's popular in Europe, particularly in Germany and Austria. The cartridge's performance is similar to other 6.5mm cartridges, such as the 6.5x55 Swedish, although it cannot be interchangeably used in the same firearms.

Overall, the 6.5x57 Mauser is prized for its flat trajectory and versatility, making it a reliable choice for both hunting and sport shooting.

#gunstr

#german

Cartridge of the Day: .250 Savage

The .250 Savage cartridge, also known as the .250-3000 Savage, was introduced by Savage Arms in 1915. It is a rifle cartridge designed for medium game hunting and is notable for being the first commercial cartridge to achieve a muzzle velocity of 3,000 feet per second (fps) with an 87-grain bullet. This high velocity was significant for its time and provided flat trajectory and effective performance for hunting.

The cartridge typically fires a bullet with a diameter of .257 inches and is available in various bullet weights, commonly ranging from 75 to 120 grains. The .250 Savage is well-regarded for its mild recoil and accuracy, making it suitable for hunting deer, antelope, and similar-sized game.

It uses a rimless, bottlenecked case design, which contributes to reliable feeding and extraction in bolt-action and some lever-action rifles. Though it has been largely overshadowed by newer, more powerful cartridges, the .250 Savage remains a favorite among enthusiasts and hunters who appreciate its historical significance and balanced performance.

#gunstr

#huntstr