Deployed zap splits on notes (NIP-57.G)

You can configure splits in "Advanced" menu:

https://void.cat/d/BqdbSHxZ2BLovHYwmpSM57.webp

Once you try to zap a post with splits you will see the recipients listed at the top and the amount they will receive:

https://void.cat/d/EGZBqkjGkyT7xPYiKCjUwv.webp

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Clear cache

Sames!

Ok, I have some work to do to support this in Ligess.

I am struggling with this UI in Amethyst at the moment. I hate the "Weight" for users. But trying to do percent is messy. Anyway, I hope to release a version soon to support this as well.

Agree weight is bad UX. Confused me.

What is wrong with percent?

Ratio slider and/or percentage would be better

Add 1 user in addition yourself:

Default: 50%-50%

If change one, make the one react accordingly

This is so much harder than weight.

how? πŸ€”

As soon as there are more than two people you have too many unconstrained variables.

read the thread

nostr:note194rakpumr4l4z5xtkmqdavdkamwp9vhwrzs3z9g0c8sa73suh5lqsljeru

Lots of side effects that must have a UI to fix them.

- What happens when percentages don't get to 100%?

- What happens if you already have a 100% setting and you add another person? Or when you remove it? Does it redistribute or do you manually go there and edit each one of them?

- Do people even want to do this math?

1) Invalid. Won't post.

2) Cannot add, zap split full. Equal split prompt.

3) Remove. Equal distribution of previous % prompt.

#nostrdesign

Option:

User wants to split. They enter people in the split. Defaults to 1 weight on each. Percentage automatically calculated and displayed. User configures weight. Percentage automatically updates.

Calculating percent is too much to ask people to do.

I tend to agree.

Exciting to use​ 🀩

If percentage is messy, just have extensive info on β€œweight”

we’re willing 2 learn

I thought weight was simple enough, if everybody has weight=1 then everybody gets an equal split

Oh now that you say that it makes sense to me

You could also just type the percent value you want as the weight, there is no difference

well then that pretty much solves it πŸ‘€

It's only simple for coders :(

Ngl if you were to add that info if everyone has weight 1 then everyone gets equal split im sure people will grasp it, (hopefully)

percentage is much more obvious to a casual pleb like myself

no need to overcomplicate the simple things πŸ’œ

it already is simple nostr:note1xf4avgncwqhh80d5c5xthjgefxj35y9hqarwd7523a5fazf4ay0q0qkc94

nostr:note13vsmtyhj29zlkyl0sx6lcamfjw2aj8vk67mqxup3ym3upcg05wlsjefty9

ideally you’d want to make it just a question of dragging and tapping/clicking, and have the percentages react to it, which you could manually change also πŸ€”

idk if someone is willing to build that I’m sure they’d use it if it solved an issue

as of rn it works

oh for sure, just trying to think of ways to make it more user friendly πŸ’œ

I weigh in! I'm with Sleepy on this.

We will learn

I’m gonna try it out myself 🫑 there’s no way we can’t learn new things, not everything has to be dumbed down πŸ«‚

https://void.cat/d/QQ12TpwpFjL3rogQR7szLD.webp

Don't know if this helps, but this is my first proposal for Highlighter.

When you move any bar it automatically adjust the other percentages (division by how many others there are).

#nostrdesign

Nice! It's very close to what I was designing.. I am not sure if I like the auto adjustment. I may make it adjust from top to bottom. Only the items below the current item get adjusted to match 100%

I don't think it's ideal neither, but it's the least confusing UX I could think of.

Users will probably only want to give a certain npub either more or nothing at all (in the latter case it should then stay fix on zero percent btw)

Using your Top-to-Bottom idea seems confusing to me and involves calculation and forethought, things I really want to avoid. Or I might have misunderstood it. Is there a particular order to the splits?

Wow !!!

Can't zap this with Alby and Amethyst ❌⚑