Subnostr

You spend energy 🐶🐾🫡

Petr 2y ago

And you get back down for free 😂

No, you do not, you paid for your trip back 🐶🐾🫡

Moot point, gravity is fiction.

You are uneducated, so please take care of this first 🐶🐾🫡

You are indoctrinated. Define gravity.

Curvature of space-time 🐶🐾🫡

That's not a definition. WHAT is it?

It’s not a WHAT! 🐶🐾🫡

Hilarious. Received options are the best

Opinions*

You can believe into whatever you want, I am not here to tell you. My job is not to educate you, I can only share what I know 🐶🐾🫡

I’m merely challenging you to question your beliefs rather than believe them blindly, and defend them by calling people uneducated. There is no experiment that one can do to replicate gravity, so it is a theoretical belief because it can only be, if you cannot replicate its effects.

I am not believing as you put it, I am basing my knowledge on the facts and logic. Again, there is no point us arguing when neither one of us is open to a change 🐶🐾🫡🫂

I used to believe it too, so I was open to change which is why I no longer do. 🫂

Ike 2y ago

Einsteinian "gravity" has never worked - observations are off by miles from model predictions. Dark matter/energy is the temporary bandaid, but you can fit a model to observations for so long until people realize you are reinforcing your theory with new, wrongly predicted observations.

What you call fact is just scribles in kid's textbooks - cosmology is still figuring out how to fix their inherited broken model.

gravity is the tendency of two bodies of matter to minimise their combined surface area

but you won't find that in any physics text books

and it is actually mediated by electrons in a special neutral configuration that in quantum physics is called "balanced" - and the opposite of this is what causes atomic bonding (direct) and ionic bonding (indirect) here direct meaning the relative proximity of the synchronised opposite spinning electrons

Source? Experiment confirming this? 🐶🐾🫡 without that it’s as good of a theory as any other magic

Do you have an experiment you can conduct to prove gravity exists?

Have you tried looking things up and see? I think we should end this conversation here, there is no point of us arguing. I don’t care if you think I am right or wrong, and neither do you 🐶🐾🫡🫂

if you don't count the repeatability of dropping an object after raising it then what is your criteria for a valid experiment?

You are simply applying a name to that without defining what it is. You cannot measure gravity, and it cannot be demonstrated in isolation. The experiment you are using define it applies circular logic. Electrostatics are an exponentially stronger force that can be measured and reproduced in isolation.

trick question because you can't prove anything, only disprove it

Ike 2y ago

Interesting - which new revision of "gravity" is this? It's clearly not Newtonian, nor Einsteinian, which are both falsified decades ago but still thaught in schools to this day.

dc

nobody 2y ago

Love is free. The more you give away, the more you end up with. That’s a net gain in my books.

Also false, love doesn’t last forever and it’s taxing on your energy unless reciprocated 🐶🐾🫡

atheists think there isn't when people die having got away with epic crimes of economic distortion and robbery

this is why christianity, and other religions that claim that there is a reckoning in the afterlife, like the Egyptian goddess Maat, weighing the hearts of the newly dead against a feather, tend to gain a big following

we might be wrong thinking someone is keeping score, but life is better for the masses when the score is being kept, so it's a useful lie, if it is a lie

i don't think it's a lie, but i don't pretend to know exactly how the reckoning is done, i just think it must be, because if the universe is based on math then it also must have balance in the equations

Yes, everything leads to maximum entropy, no magic 🐶🐾🫡

if this were true then there would be no life on this planet

it just gets more and more expensive to do it the more complex the ordered system becomes

as Terence Mckenna expresses it: Nature is a novelty conserving engine

novelty is just another word for rare new structure

there is nothing novel about disorder, nobody pays you for giving them less order

That’s a false assumption, because complexity accelerates entropy. Look it up, I am not imagining it 🐶🐾🫡

i said specifically that the greater the structure (size and order) the lower the frequency of its occurrance, and what you speak of is the effect of this pattern

god bless nassim taleb but he is correct when he says that the greater the amount of order in a system the higher the cost of maintaining it, or conversely, the bigger the system, the easier it is to destroy it

the bitcoin blockchain is an example of a complex system that has elements that maintain and accumulate order, and of course, its energy budget must increase in proportion with the amount of structured data it maintains

Dispensing energy is exactly what entropy is. And you always get less than you input. Always. 🐶🐾🫡

entropy is information that is hard to predict emerging from an exchange

sometimes it really can be caled "negentropy" because very occasionally shuffling a system causes order to increase

this pattern is what taleb calls "antifragile"

only materialists who disregard the presence of information and its influence on physics don't get this

it's central to understanding what the very notion of "economic growth" actually means, not the stupid NGU of fiat but the actual reduction of inefficiencies

negentropy is the general category of all things that have value and what mckenna was calling "novelty"

Pseudoscience IMHO, but yet again. There is no point of us arguing when neither of us are open to a change 🐶🐾🫡🫂