how have i lost the plot exactly. Most people disagreeing with me don’t seem to understand the technical nuance of the spam issues at play.
I believe utxospam is much worse than op_return spam, so i am acting accordingly.
If “pleb” noderunners disagree then so be it. They can continue living in an alternate reality that doesn’t affect me.
The "lost the plot" part was directed at the note I replied to. Obviously all nodes being full nodes is not bad for decentralization.
I think/hope your rationale is -- if all nodes HAVE to be full nodes --> there would be fewer full nodes --> which would be bad for decentralisation.
But your phrasing is easily misinterpreted to something that sounds like people should prefer to run pruned nodes. Thats the way I read it the first time.
My point with respecting the signal from a substantial amount of noderunners is, since the problem the proposed change seeks to fix and the response is as controversial as it is, no change should be implemented. A better fix should be given time to be thought of.
pruned nodes are full nodes
You get to decide your own semantics, but for yourself only.
I'd argue its silly to think pruned node = full node and full node != full archival node. Why have a mode called pruned then!
Obviously full node = full archival node and PRUNED NODE IS PRUNED and cannot serve IBD.
full means fully validating. Its not “me deciding my own semantics “. Its literally what it means
Utxo spam which is cheaper to produce will not go away because you invited op return spam, you will get more of both.
