Replying to Avatar Trey

Bitcoin is having its Covid moment.

The gain of function mutation in Core v30 that removes the default OP_RETURN relay policy size limit has resulted in an environment in bitcoin culture that closely mirrors the Covid era.

The threat of the spam virus has turned normally level-headed, sane bitcoiners into hysterical hypochondriacs with a touch of authoritarianism.

One side advocates for mask mandates and quarantines, while the other side hosts superspreader parties in brazen mockery.

I’ve seen public shaming, baseless virtue signaling, shameless moral superiority, and even appeals to law enforcement to arrest offending opponents.

Each side parrots the party line, taking cues from their respective authority figures, and using language they just learned a week ago as if they’ve been experts all along.

I’ve spent countless hours sifting through the noise, doing my best to fairly consider each argument. My perspective is this: Filters are like wearing a mask when you walk through a restaurant, only to take it off when you sit down. Masks don’t stop the virus, but if it makes you feel better, then go for it.

However, there’s a wave of mass hysteria spreading, where reason and thoughtfulness has been overcome by a fever of existential crisis. And as it was during Covid, this lockdown-style reaction is way worse than the disease you’re fighting.

Bitcoin will be just fine. It is healthy, fit, strong, and has a great immune system. The best thing you can do is get some fresh air and some exercise. This is not an existential threat in any way, and we shouldn’t treat it that way.

Oof, that's a really bad take. If anything core and CDC both have the same authoritarian "trust the experts" attitude. It's a good analogy, applied inversely to how you just did. 🙄

Bitcoin is money, not a file sharing system. The only people who disagree with this are shitcoiners. They are the only people stupid, venal and high time preference enough to use the best money of all time to trade bored apes or some equally or more retarded use.

To actively enable this sort of degeneracy *completely* discredits the current core maintainers. Fortunately Knots already is 25% of the node count, so we are well on the way to making them obsolete anyway.

The only thing I agree with here is that Bitcoin has a strong immune system. It starts at a cultural level, by me calling you a clown on nostr.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzph5g2qql43a2kx3p57fmz57z3hw95722sx8mf7ultmvfcves9a7cqqsdr2ka0qhv3jwqz8qrdxxf7x4jy2wup8uq0svsgk35ug08tntn93s0q9r8f

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

In fairness, I did call out both sides as acting in poor faith. But the sensationalism and end-of-world moral thrashings are definitely skewed from the Knots side, from what I’ve witnessed. People are literally tagging the FBI on X… just wow.

The good news is that you have full control over your own node, which is the beauty of bitcoin. We can all take individual responsibility for what code and settings we run, and it will have zero bearing on bitcoin, and what others choose to run on their nodes will have zero bearing on you.

Unless we’re talking about changes to consensus, this is just performative.

You can’t control what ends up in the chain as a node if miners choose to accept CSAM off band. Consensus changes are not needed to prevent the chain from becoming littered with CSAM in a format that throws plausible deniability out the window. It’s not hard to grasp.

When people reasonably believe the government will put them in jail because they are hosting illegal content on their server guess what will happen. They will stop running nodes. At which point we become centralized and rely on third parties to transact, and all for what?

“Well that’s an unlikely outcome, isn’t it?” Why are we rolling the dice? What is the great benefit?

Again, it’s not hard to see the risk reward balance is off.

Just prune your node? Again, your node is the only thing you can control.