Why would you want weak men or women over here anyway?
Discussion
What does this even mean dawg
Someone who quits after 2 days is weak sauce regardless of their motives.
So far people have been complaining there's hardly anybody on nostr. I say there're exactly the right ones over here already. Maybe this is the crowd that value a freedom protocol for communication. The rest are statists cucks.
Other complains I've see:
- too much bitcoin content
- circle jerk
- nazis
Karens want an audience. Legacy social media have fucked their small brains too much, too hard for too long. They can't envision a world where people are just free to do whatever they want. If this is not bitcoin ethos...
this is simply not sustainable. nostr is for everyone, even the groups of people we personally dislike.
nevent1qqswkqq4u5p9s5af60tcna9f8285hjq6y6c8te44jsy8jy3t9vlgmkspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgm6wy0f
I exchange notes here on nostr constantly with people I dislike and I assume they do the same. Taking good ideas from people you genuinely dislike is a superpower.
Not to mention that in time you understand that what you hated in others was just a dark side of you all along. People use noatr for different reasons. I use it because the smartest and the most retarded people I know are here.
I wouldn't worry about adoption since Primal has already set the bar low enough.
I actually agree with you here. But, i will say that it doesn’t diminish the fact that nostr IS a walled off garden, a very uniquely small and diverse garden, but walled off nonetheless. No matter our personal experiences on here, we must admit the issue without taking personal offense.
I wouldn't mind if more people got on nostr, but my experience is that people simply don't care about freedom. First I thought Milgram was exaggerated with his experiment...
Not even the people banned on legacy social media want something like nostr. They simply retry their luck over there. There's a lesson in this.
nostr desperately needs new users, nobody wants to admit it and would rather gatekeep for some reason
I agree, but they need to be the right users or they won't enjoy it.
I'm also on Reddit and StackExchange, no way would I invite 90% of them here...
Why not?
They would be traumatised. And we would be bored.
Idk, i think they would be great to have. i’m not a stock investor, but i love community. even stock investors.
in the end, devs deserve to have their hard work be recognized. the gatekeeping due to personal bias is hurting us bad. admitting the issue is the first step, it’s not a personal attack to admit the elephant in the room
Devs would rather circle jerk each others pet projects and simp for VC funds than make shit users want.
...or test it before wasting everyone's time.
Users don't know what they want until they see it.
It's nice to hear someone say this.
I think that’s the sort of vibe that puts people off to be honest.
People are people, some good, some bad, most a mix of good and bad. Monoculture is pretty dull.