Well they did shoot an unarmed civilian🤷🏻♂️.
Discussion
He had a gun last I saw. Was disarmed a second before he was shot, by one of may wrestling with him. Legal carrier. That's all I know. I don't wanna dissect and argue it but that's the facts I've seen so far. Correct me if I'm wrong
Are people still talking about that?
There is much bigger fish to fry.
People are so easily distracted.
Seems so. I'll shut up for a bit. Haven't followed details that closely.
People like you are so annoying. Whenever anybody doesnt talk about the thing you want to talk about, you act like its some conspiracy to distract you.
It happened today, and is very significant. If the conversation is too much for you, then dont contribute
he wasn't unarmed.
The gun was removed off him, by an agent, then they shot him.
one agent in the fray knew he removed the gun. that doesn't mean they all knew. the shooter may have seen an empty holster and (incorrectly) assumed the victim drew it.
this doesn't excuse the whole situation, and federal agents can fuck themselves, but its important to be prudent with the details.
