Health organisations have led to the sickest population in 70 years. The CDC has never cured a disease.
Yet people rabidly defend this like a religion, while 3/4 of the population have a chronic disease. People are lost and subverted.
https://video.nostr.build/921a20ab04eae30f9dc3bb661d7b69bb3e83b5c43ff72fec8b06ca5855c7308c.mp4
I couldn’t agree more! 🔥💯 Part of the problem is that the world has been duped into thinking that the “health organisations” are about health & that without the state people would be less healthy. The evidence shows that the opposite is true, just that most people don’t want to or can’t see what’s right in front of them.
It's so insane.
If modern medicine is so great, why the fuck is everyone sicker than ever? Simple questions that never get an answer.
You know?! Answering that question would destroy the white coat cult overnight. The UK for example, spends the equivalent of Approx 2.5% of its GDP on pharma drugs, but generally speaking you don’t see improved health outcomes that match that spending. In fact, it’s the opposite
Too many stupid people. I saw Pocahontas going after rfk in the same meeting - the bitch was crying he had removed a vaccine pending proper trials, while she has received almost 7 figures in pharma donations.
Funny how shooters never go after any of thee people, unless its a psyop like Luigi. More indicators that everything is fake and gay.
Funny you should mention shooters, I think some time last week I wanted to make a post posing that same question that why do the shooters always shoot schools, churches, concerts etc but never try their luck with folks like Gates or Schwab. When a shooter did go up and shoot up the ATL CDC for injuring him with the clot shot, it was memory holed like it never happened. I eventually self censored and didn’t post it because it was definitely going to be so far out the Overton window for most to handle. Spot on observation right there 🎯
If the shooters are real, then is reckon they'd be about as powerful psychologically as rapists. Rapists are pathetic weak pieces of shit. They'd never risk taking on someone who is surrounded by an army of guards.
Interesting, I never even heard about the CDC shooter. Riminds me of the guy who flew his plane into an IRS building. Swept right under the rug, cause they don't want that idea going "viral"
Wait what?! There is a dude who flew his plane into an IRS building?! When did this happen and what was his grievance? As you can see, that was memory holed to the point that I also missed that one
The main reason I know is because it happened a few minutes away from me in Austin, Texas.
Guy got pushed to the edge by tax collectors and flew a small plane into the building.
I'll see if I can link an article..
https://www.npr.org/2010/02/18/123848559/plane-crashes-into-irs-office-in-texas
Whoa! This is almost similar to the guy who shot up the CDC! I can see why this was memory holed, can’t have too many people decide to throw off their chains
James Corbett made a really good documentary on Rockefeller medicine. It's one of his older documentaries. All his stuff is good.
Probably self inflicted.
Like better medications and 'cures' like that Ozempic pill now is a quick way to get "healthy" so subconsciously people eat worse because they're like "we can just get the meds for that"
Also, I think there's an overmedicated society in America too, often unnecessarily when good diet and health should be the suggestion, doctors just push pills for kickbacks
Hell yeah
Unregulated foods leads to this. Go on, continue with deregulation of food and let companies dictate what goes into your food.
Why does Europe not have this problem? Or anywhere else for this matter? Because quality control and food regulations prohibit the use of chemicals, preservatives, sudo-sugars and GMO carbs.
Then you have big pharma...
The subsidization by the government of horrible monoculture agriculture is a huge factor as well.
If wheat farmers that are spraying their crops with roundup at harvest time weren't getting subsidies they would be growing what the market actually wanted- like grass fed beef.
If the products that "should be regulated" weren't so artificially cheap (and engineered to be addictive) they wouldn't have as much market share.
Cutting off foodstamp access to processed foods would also help IMO
Pharma is another huge factor- you're right. They get customers for life and never cure anything
The history of Monsanto is dark, and knowing. So is Dow
The US has food regulation; it's just written by the industry.
Watching proof of work types shit on people with actual proof of work in their fields is pretty lost and subverted - I agree.
What's the actual proof of work you're referring to?
All the scientists, that are NOT politicians, that know what the fuck they are talking about because they’ve worked at it their entire lives (POW), having to listen to morons babbling bullshit they heard their favorite “health guru” spew. It’s maddening.
What's funny is the pow experts largely did this to themselves. It's an own goal, and now they are upset the public don't trust them.
If only everyone wasn't being censored, maybe things would have worked out differently. But to this day, only one side is interested in establishing support for claims.
I think it's hilarious, and every day the turn tables just a little more, exposing the corrupt charade masquerading as healthcare.
There is no quarterly meeting of the POW experts whose edicts resulted in an “own goal”. The folks doing the science are rarely in front of a hot mic. If you are going to call something a “charade” yet can’t pass a pop-quiz in physics, chemistry or biology you are trusting someone else for your opinions in these things. You cannot fake proof of work. That’s the point.
None of this shit is being handed in a scientific way and it’s “Idocrocy” level fucked up to watch.
You're right to be annoyed, as are the rest of us.
