I've personally funded more open source Bitcoin development than Saylor 😏
Discussion
also you have educated more people
quality > quantity
That one could be debated.
https://learn.saylor.org/?utm_source=nb&utm_medium=p&utm_campaign=Courses&redirect=0
I'm aware. But I think situations like these give people emotional predisposition to ignore or dislike everything some figure in a community has ever done.
Kinda like politics.
Saylor might have a bad take. Or many bad takes. But I'm not going to pretend like he hasn't brought a lot of good to the world.
Same
You've also shitcoined more lol
That's great! How about funding one more? Right now we are in dire need of decentralized coinjoin coordination. Have a look at joinstr.xyz , might be worth funding
I think we all have…
Same
So have I!
nostr:npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp and nostr:npub15dqlghlewk84wz3pkqqvzl2w2w36f97g89ljds8x6c094nlu02vqjllm5m both have made amazing contributions to Bticoiners, neither is infallible but both are top 1% contributors. If you listen to the Saylor interview he says, don't listen to me. Pete pushed him to talk about it many times. I think its a good interview with things for people to talk about.
It reminded me of this tweet from Pete Rizzo
Any0ne can fUnd 0penS0Urce c0ders but m0ney can't bUy ethical c0ders like U , Linus Trovalds & many others.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRlxN0_zVHo
#opensource #backdoor
Me too 🙃
nostr:note1cyrnd56p32hqumf7eujngjte9a4lugx3mn9rd9ennppy9lyw0qfqwht39x
Same, but
nostr:note1rwgher9wc7jk2ujfh0amw3aks257jzu2rz7d8rretw0clsq6696qjq68h5