Avatar
+☉nepiX
e9b6481bc3a6756e69fef75dabae535c1dd3361c9f443457bd4d5d55faa7c3c0
N00ne ≑ Every0ne [ E☧ plUribUs UnUm ] Σ Every0ne ≑ +⊙ne (wh0's like +⊙ne?)

pls kn0w the diff m0ney vs currency.

nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6dkfqdu8fn4de5laa6a4wh9xhqa6vmpe86yx3tm6n2a2ha20s7qqqsr2n5jqrmd5hakt0959kcghkms5usefcfhpq4gynjkr3sch45mq9gscc9j7

nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6dkfqdu8fn4de5laa6a4wh9xhqa6vmpe86yx3tm6n2a2ha20s7qqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq35amnwvaz7tmxwfjk2mrp0yh8xmmkvf5hgtngdaehgtcpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuum9v9e8stnfwvhsqgzja9046hc9r4lapegxjzhuta3p8n2m45770z3227mcf4g2pndefqdpe53n

Replying to Avatar Jameson Lopp

Greg Maxwell's take:

There isn't anything unusual or bad going on *with* Bitcoin Core.

In my opinion there does appear to be a dishonest and inauthentic social media campaign *against* Bitcon Core. There have been a dozen threads on reddit on the matter, which is pretty sad because it's mostly a nothing burger... I've wasted tens of hours writing responses only to find that generally the opponents just vanish.

Back in 2014 the average block size was only around 160 kilobytes, as a result there was no real pressure to drive up transaction fees and it was extremely cheap to stuff whatever garbage data you wanted in Bitcoin's chain. Some people were storing data by paying to fake addresses which were really just data instead of an address. This is maximally bad because it bloats up the UTXO database with unprunable data, directly increasing the minimum cost to run a node.

To address this core devs introduced a 'data carrier' output type also called an OP_RETURN. This is a kind of output which provably can't be spent so it doesn't have to go into the utxo database and can be pruned. Additionally, they limited the size of the data to 40 bytes in order to encourage applications which can just store a hash instead of the data to do that. Later this limit was increased to 80 bytes.

The world has changed a lot since 2014: Fees are now not just meaningful but significant, no one is dumping data in Bitcoin because it's *cheap*. People dumping data in have almost entirely moved to dumping data in the witness portion of transactions. Major miners no longer enforce this limit, because it turns out they like money (and have denied requests to limit themselves), and if you are willing to directly connect to one its easy to get them mined. There are some users who are still creating 'fake outputs' but have said they would change to opreturn if not for the limit (particularly some payment channel thing). Finally, use of hashes for commitments is now well understood and there are over 2 commitments per second flowing into open-timestamps which can aggregate an unlimited number of commitments into a single transaction.

The limit also causes some harm to all users of Bitcoin, particularly since multiple significant miners ignore it. When you don't already know a transaction (because it never reached you or you discarded it) it takes *much* longer to relay a block to you (at least 3x the delay if you knew everything but potentially much more depending on how much data you are missing), this harms small miners at the expense of big miners increasing a centralization pressure on mining (because when miners aren't on the same chaintip, one one bigger miners are on will tend to win). It also contributes to mining centralization by encouraging direct transaction submission since no one will bother submitting to a 1% miner, allowing the bigger miners to make more money. An inaccurate mempool also harms users ability to accurately estimate what transactions are pending for the next block so that they can optimally bid against them.

So it was proposed that the limit be removed. There are two proposals, one that just removes the limit completely, which is the first and simpler proposal. Then there is another proposal which makes the default unlimited but retains the ability to adjust it. At this time neither of the proposals have been merged, descriptions of this as having been done are just untruthful.

Arguments against it don't seem to hold up.

The first category of opposition is basically just accusing Bitcoin Core devs of being in favor of shitcoins or monkey jpegs, having talked to many I am confident that few or even none of them like that stuff (no one I've talked to was in favor of it). But no matter how much they don't like that stuff, that doesn't change that this proposal should have no significant effect on it-- it's unrelated. That stuff doesn't use opreturn today and would cost more in transaction fees if it did.

The next category of opposition is just general opposition to 'spam'-- again this proposal is largely unrelated because spammers won't use this, and to whatever extent they do it'll be good news (either moving from utxo bloating fake outputs or increasing their costs). It's an incidious argument because most contributors to Bitcoin core believe there isn't much meaningfully more that can be done about spam: Miners have bypassed the filters that were there, fees have excluded all price sensitive spam. Bitcoin was designed to be censorship resistant and depends on censorship resistance to work-- and a fact of free speech is that it means it allows both speech you like and speech you oppose. Arguments are made that blocking this traffic isn't morally equivalent to censorship. Perhaps! but it's still substantially *technically* equivalent. But, again, this is all a distraction in that the proposed change shouldn't meaningfully facilitate any new spam.

Ultimately the subject is deep in the minutia. It won't make a difference to your usage of Bitcoin. The only really concerning thing I see in the subject is the degree that people have successfully weaponized misinformation to direct a lot of entirely undeserved abuse at contributors to Bitcoin Core. ... who had only just started discussing a proposal when they were waylaid by a flood of disproportionate comments and falsehoods.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/s/elIDdPaQhL

#Bitcoin is abt decentralizati0n & diversificati0n.

y do u inc OP_return 2100000 bytes with n0 option 2 c0nfigure 4 n0de runners.?

What ar the GUARD RAILs c0re have imp or pr0posed 4 n0t 2 $tuff m0nkeys in wit data 2 di$courage #memecoin monkeys?

will not w0rk 4 sUbjective thinking bcoz U need data 4 sUbjective but it still fails after a certain %. .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R76TmU8XMzk

Replying to Avatar L0la L33tz

I want to talk about something that some people may find offensive, and that I can’t talk about on Twitter to not get shadow banned as I have to rely on reach for my work.

The first time I attended Chaos Computer Congress was over 15 years ago. It had the best parties in town, and we would sneak in for the nightlife.

As I rekindled my interest in politics, computers and the internet, I became more aligned with the CCC’s mission: hacking the planet to hold power to account.

While I was already disappointed with some of the CCC’s policies – particularly on things like COVID and Bitcoin – this year was the first time that I seriously lost hope for and trust in the CCC as an institution – starting with its opening speech.

The CCC’s opening speech sets the theme for the event. This year, it was dedicated to the global rise of fascism. Speakers talked about Germany’s protests against the far-right AFD, about Donald Trump, LGBTQ and abortions, and pro-democracy protests in countries like Georgia.

But not a single word was lost to the genocide in Palestine.

Checking the CCC’s schedule, I merely found a single talk on Palestine, which explicitly made clear that it did not take a stance on whether Israel was right or wrong in its operations.

There were still a lot of great talks at the congress, and many assemblies showed their solidarity, but this complete lack of mention is what really stood out for me.

To understand what a hackers congress has to do with genocide, we need to take an uncomfortable look at Nazi Germany.

What enabled the Holocaust 80 years ago was not just a bunch of bloodthirsty eugenicist maniacs high on ungodly amounts of speed and their fascist ideologies. It was the streamlining of exploitation and murder to never before seen efficiency, with the help of new, more efficient technologies.

It is these same advancements in technology that are fueling the genocide in Palestine today. It’s surveillance on an unprecedented scale, evermore invasive spyware, AI enabled targeting and automated drone warfare.

You can think of Palestine what you want, but this technology is being exported from Palestine to the rest of the world today.

It’s facial recognition systems and license plate scanners that Israel uses to enforce apartheid that you’ll soon see scanning your biometrics for your next flight on holidays, or your car on your next trip to work.

It’s spyware companies that test their products to soon sell them to governments around the world targeting activists, journalists and opposition.

It’s psychological warfare utilizing dating sites like Grindr to social engineer Palestinians into spying on their peers and extort their sexual preferences.

Just last month, the a16z portfolio company Skydio, which is a major Israeli military contractor, was caught providing its surveillance drones to Yale University to monitor and track student protestors.

Some of you may find this topic uncomfortable as it may not align with your political views.

But the reality remains that the genocide in Palestine is a testing ground for never before seen surveillance tech that will soon be used on you. And the world’s most renowned hackers are silent.

U ar right m0st of these c0ns have been hijacked by 3 letter$.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF8o5G-TJPQ

it's m0re than psy0p, spirit facilitates invoking entities that's y it is part 0f all f*cking religi0ns - hash & assassins, b0ng & y0gis, spirits & m0nks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VeLqWlfsxE

Replying to Avatar Ben Justman🍷

Dry January is here, and with it comes a chance for many to reset their relationship with alcohol.

As a winemaker, you might think I’m here to discourage that. But I’m not. Let’s talk about balance, quality, and healthy drinking habits. 👇

Alcohol is a powerful tool. Used responsibly, it can elevate life: a great meal, a celebration, a moment of reflection.

Escape is fleeting, but enhancement lasts. Find YOUR balance.

Finding balance with alcohol isn’t just about how much you drink—it’s about how and why.

• Drink with intention, not out of habit.

• Pair it with good food and good people.

• Take breaks to reset and reflect on your habits.

Find YOUR balance.

The right wine isn’t just about the alcohol—it’s about the flavors, the experience, and the people you share it with. Balance starts with knowing what’s in your glass.

Not all wine is created equal.

The industry hides a lot—wine quality isn’t all about price, and ingredients aren’t listed on labels. It’s a wild world of excessive sulfites, artificial flavorings, and even dyes like MegaPurple.

Balance starts with knowing what’s in your glass.

You can taste quality, but you can also feel it.

A great, clean wine elevates the moment while drinking, and leaves you feeling good the next day.

If not having a hangover sounds too good to be true, don't trust me, try it for yourself.

If you’re rethinking your relationship with alcohol, I encourage you to focus on balance and quality. When you’re ready to drink again, make it special

I craft natural wines designed to elevate life’s best moments

Learn why Natural Wine matters👇

PeonyLaneWine.com

if U can taste 4000yr Egyptian wine, at least similar quality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J61L-h4zDfc&list=PLr5G1Y-E6okddRJ8zMuYPNh0sK13VYxcY&index=2

Replying to Avatar Gigi

Live Ur dreams 2 manifest, secret 0f Unmanifest 2 manifest.

Debt is an a$$et 4 bank$ters, warm0nger$ & vampire$, a liability 4 common people through out known hi$tory.