Unpopular opinion:

The mRNA vaccine platform has the potential to be an incredible breakthrough in fighting disease. Done correctly, it would tell your body to use its own natural immunity to produce resistance to infection agents, and would cause no damage to the body.

Its really kind of amazing when you get into the science of it.

The problem is not mRNA. The problem is Pfizer. To put it plainly, they are.... evil.

What is being discovered now, is that the side effects are likely the result of the manufacturing process. Or more specifically, it looks like Pfizer used a different manufacturing process for the mass distributed vaccines than it used for its submitted test vaccines. And hid it.

All over the world now, different researchers are discovering plasma dna contamination in the vaccines. The current hypothesis for why this is present is:

Pfizer used bacteria as a rapid growth medium for the dna used to produce the rna. In the test vaccines they took care to remove the residual plasma dna from the process. But in mass production, they let that slide. And as a result, sent out large batches of vaccine with varying levels of residual plasma dna contamination. The side effects of that will vary widely. But in some cases, its likely some people have had their dna altered. That genomic change would be permanent, and hereditary.

Additionally there is strong evidence they used e-coli in the bacterial process because of its rapid reproduction. The membranes of the bacteria used to produce the dna which is used for rna production, is an endotoxin, and results in massive levels of inflammation in the body if not removed after the vaccine production process. It looks like Pfizer also cut corners here.

Basically, it looks like Pfizer hid the fact that their vaccine mass production process was different from their test vaccine process, and cut corners on mass production process, resulting in vaccine batches filled with potentially dna altering material, and endotoxins which produce massive inflammation.

This would be consistent with many of the strange side effects seen all over the world.

So. While the mRNA platform seems to have a great deal of potential, seems like Pfizer is not the company to do it. Besides..their entire corporate board should be in prison.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nice explanation.

I still think it is a bad idea to let mRNA alter the genetic instructions of a cell to produce virus like substances. This is basically exactly what a virus does (but they also program the cell to copy the DNA) and super unnatural. And there is nothing that the body can do to stop this if it goes wrong.

Your body also cannot stop the nano particles, they stay in your system and continue scratching holes in your body cells. If the mRNA can enter the cells via those holes, what else can?

And you are at complete mercy of those who create the mRNA. And we have all seen how untransoarant that was.

Fair enough. It may turn out to be just a compelling hypothesis which can’t practically be administered safely. Time will tell.

It just really bothers me that corrupt mega corporations do so much damage to legitimate scientific research, and even more damage to people.

Also, your immune system still has to FIND the immunity naturally. They find a string and need to find an immunity against it. Like any other virus. In this case the body produces it which is weird and doesnt give additional benefits. The immune system still has to do its job normally right?

Well if you’re asking me personally,

for my own life, i am an unapologetic antivaxxer. To a rather extreme degree. Have been for quite a long time, and don’t see that changing anytime soon.

But i hope that mRNA research continues. Compelling possibilities.

As for it being used as a rapid response technology, i think the people at the top who pushed that agenda, and suppressed therapeutics, should be shot.

I was wondering if you know if the workings of the mRNA vaccin make the immune system behave any different. Because that is crucial information.

who knows, trade secrets... but ok, just let them coerce you into taking it.

the whole marketing schtick is the mrna crap makes your cells slippery to the spike protein that breaches and penetrates the membrane.

apparently that means your lung cells end up covered in spikes. what could possibly go wrong?

The mrna spike protein is created by human cells at command of the messenger rna. There are also lipid nano particles that "scratch the cells open" so those mrna strings surrounded in a fat membrane can enter the cell.

that doesn't sound dangerous. "scratch the cells". like the spike protein breaches them. they like to cloak this all in fancy words but the fact is it's a virus that delivers a custom mRNA payload.

and that also means that those who didn't get it, but were exposed to shedding, probably have immunity to the "scratchy fat layer" ahem PENETRATION MECHANISM.

ah yes, this also means that probably some people were immune to this "medicine" also, and didn't get "protection" from it. i'm sure they varied that thing substantially to try and get it to work with more people. sheesh, frankendoctors.

good to know.

makes me wonder if this isn't going to be important later on.

i'm sure there is a test that can show i have immunity to the "scratchy fat layer".

i was worried for a time that being around recently vaxxed might cause me to have my DNA rewritten as well, but the answer is, probably not, because insufficient cells are breached without intramuscular administration, meaning immunity! well, probably immunity, depends on whether i got shed on enough for the immune system to notice the problem.

it's total clown world witchdoctoring if you ask me. dna is a highly complex, highly cross-interactive system, where changing one thing can have an impact that you don't see until much later on. probably a lot of cancer, for a start.

this is why in my current working theory of health, eliminating things is always better. take enough extra garbage out of the system and it can correct itself.

I don't think that the spike proteïnes are the ones causing openings in the cel membrame. I think that is the lipid nano particles (maybe graphene?).

there has to be a selector that finds the right cell, and a breacher, which opens the cell membrane.

it's possible they are using a hybrid technique with a passive breacher that creates an open socket with an enzyme style matcher that positions the breacher, but it's more likely it's just a plain old lung virus of some kind they use to deliver it with, one that is extremely rare so the chances are very few people are immune and won't have the mRNA penetrate ze cells.

i hope i don't have to remind you that any "official" papers on this frankenmedicine are going to be as credible as the old "cigarettes are safe" and "asbestos is safe" studies. or like the one that "oops" they accidentally gave the rats meth instead of mdma. but the media ran with the "mdma is neurotoxic" story anyhow, even though both meth and mdma can cause neurotoxixcity via hyperthermia and stroke (similar to benzo withdrawal and epilepsy).

Why are some cells not fit and others are?

they are different because they do different things. in each cell, some things if they are let in will cause the cell to malfunction, so it has protective structures that prevent this. it's not unlike the openings of a building, and the various shapes and sizes and ways that they are opened and what they let in and out.

In this case the cells don't have a choice but to let it in.

doesn't mean the owner of the cells has given permission. that makes it a tresspass and a break and enter.

if I smash a window to get into my own house that's not a break and enter, that's me damaging my own property, which i am free to do.

yes, that's the most important thing about mRNA is it works just like GMO. take a virus, remove its payload, insert another RNA code in place, spend billions on paying off news anchors and city council administrators to coerce people.

Not agreeing on how good the technology is, but it is an interesting explanation.

And moderna and jhonnsen & jhonnsen were even taken of the market for their vaccines, I wonder what went wrong with their production process.

nostr:nevent1qqsv89t43cc208lk4swsxdcl7svupn8u2xeey3g27eptg9fdk0hpgggpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzypssvegyv9lw0yu8qg0p3jylk7w3mk7ru7llr88j9x85q3n0su27jqcyqqqqqqgqyq80k

Our bodies don't need to be told to fight infections.

mRNA should be used where something is missing and the person individually at risk of death or suffering without that missing piece. That is probably all.

that sounds interesting, but would be mostly obsolete. There are certain types of white blood cells that are able to modify themselves genetically to combat infection. The immune system of mammals is already awesome and complex.

however, it would be interesting for making things like a sort of artificial telomere. You could even use AI to mitigate the risk of being betrayed by big pharma

The initial problem is that for all of that written above there is mo data for proof. It is all hypotheses

For me the issue wasn't the potential of the technology, as much as it was the unilateral, global push to wave any form of public indemnity from it's premature deployment. That, and having zero access to a vaccine based on a traditional platform. That is why I said no to it.

I think immunologists are too confident in their supposed understanding of immunity.

The simple story that a vaccine just needs to show the "immune system" an antigen and it takes care of the rest is only loosely true some of the time.

Vaccines work, sometimes, but I suspect that it's not for the reasons that immunologists tell themselves.

Stop filthing the bodies up with xenobiotics & toxic metals, and the immune system will handle most insults on it's own. No proprietary interference necessary.

I think you should be talking to Pfizer, the Medical Industrial Complex, the corporate captured media, and government lobbyists instead of one person you dont know on the internet. 🤓