liberal "science" is that climate is mainly a function of cow farts and not significantly influenced by things like the sun. and that current temperatures are unprecedented even though they were higher through half of history, but not the part of history liberals choose to look at.
conservative "science" is that life begins at conception, and cannot be terminated at any point after that - unless you're a Palestinian, in which case your life must be terminated because you're a terrorist. conservative science also states that if you have sex with a 17 year old girl you're a pedophile and should be killed, even though Jesus' mother Mary was 12, but that was immaculate conception though.
both liberals and conservatives make a point of screaming " THIS IS SCIENCE ! ! ! " whenever they spew their nonsense.
Utter nonsense. There is no liberal science or conservative science. Science is not a political endeavor. It's a universal process for determining truth. There are liberals who are scientists, and there are conservatives who are scientists. And their affiliation means nothing. The evidence and peer review process determines the conclusions of various hypotheses, and what the consensus position is. What you describe is what science looks like to people who have no idea how science works.
that's called 99% of people.
Scientists, and people in scientific fields make up way more than 1% of the population. And regardless of how many people understand how science works, the way it works is fixed and the basis of the process by which it is carried out. What uneducated people believe is irrelevant.
irrelevant sure, because you need a PHD to vote
oh wait, you don't even need an ID
I don't even know what we're talking about at this point. I'm just going to consider this discussion closed.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
