I posted a picture in another reply of how the guy claiming to have used the cloud textures to make the footage was caught with his pants down when the textures.com account shared their DMs showing that the guy had been lying and trolling all along.
There is no confusion. The API clearly shows the two images in question were added months after the footage was already online, and years after the other images in that library existed. The API has nothing to do with the domain migration. If it was, then ALL of the images on that gallery would have the same date, but those two specific images do not. They were added after the fact.
Similarly with the explosion, there is just ONE matched frame if you apply a bunch of effects to the so called original explosion animation. Anyone who suggests is a perfect match is lying to you because it isn't. Try it for yourself.
SNC deleting references of Gorgon Stare is pretty damning evidence. Why remove it and close your phone lines just as the system gets associated with the videos? The videos are a precise match to the GS system. Dual cameras for a stereoscopic image, two different imaging types (normal and thermal), remotely accessed via a session, the GS system is shared by the navy and air force so the leaker would have had access. All the obvious evidence is there.
If you consider that Ashton is a psyop, it’s not inconceivable that some « damning evidence » have been planted to support the psyop. I have seen enough of them to realize how sophisticated they can be.
Regarding the explosion, I know that Ashton says it’s not a match but honestly I don’t see how this match can be due to chance. That’s one of this case where your belief on the case will alter your perception one way or the other but I think that if your were to ask random people whether or not the two images match (outside of the context of the #MH370), most of them will they it does.
Also, when I hear the guy who took the picture versus #AshtonForbes, there is no doubt in my mind who’s the one pushing a narrative. Maybe the photographer is a fed and great actor but highly doubt it whereas Ashton displays a lot patterns of someone gaslighting his audience. He’s been pretty successful at it that’s for sure but he won’t fool everybody.
Well, seeing as some of the people trying to debunk the footage have been exposed as frauds who are lying... what are the odds that there are honest people trying to do a debunk? So far, the only liars have been on one side of this story.
It's not just Ashton saying it's not a match. The match is achieved on ONE frame of the animation AFTER applying multiple effects.
Anyone suggesting the footage is a match has been duped. The alleged explosion animation has been used in films and video games, but it's never been altered. I would agree if the animation was a complete match for the duration. But it's not even close, it's a single frame and it needs to be manipulated for an approximate match on the single frame. So why doesn't the rest of the animation match? Come on, be honest and explain that.
https://youtu.be/vtHCCgIw3tc
As I said previously, I’m not as interested in the arguments related to video editing because I don’t have the expertise and time to assess the claims being made but when I go back to this clouds picture, I still don’t see a debunking of it besides calling the photographer and KimDotCom feds. And again, because I have good reasons to believe that Ashton is disingenuous on this point (has he ever tried to debunk that the picture wasn’t available on cgtextures.com?), that’s enough for me to draw the conclusion that Ashton is the actor of a psyop. Ashton doesn’t act as a researcher since he avoid/ignore some piece of evidences contradicting his narrative. I smell propaganda and not truth seeking when I look at his positions. Obviously, we won’t agree here.
Yeah, that's clear.
The cloud images don't exist anywhere online prior to October 2014. Not sure what other evidence could be required.
I do have expertise in video editing and compositing, and I'm telling you that regardless of the clouds and explosion, the timeline of the video makes it impossible to have been faked, and I'm willing to put money against that claim for anyone who wants to make the video from scratch.
Your only saving grace is the clouds, while you ignoring the mountain of evidence opposing that claim.
The API screenshot doesn’t prove that the picture was online before 2014. That’s the interpretation made of a data with no digital chain of custody.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
