The world doesn't need to know who Satoshi was.

Bitcoin isn't a commodity, it never was, and "The Bitcoin Community" must become irrelevant, like the old Home Brew Computing clubs did.

Bitcoin is not an asset class, and it never was. What it is will be made clear to many, very soon.

The trajectory of Bitcoin will follow the trajectory of the other world-changing innovations, and so will the reaction to it and management of the public’s access to it.

The web, Smart Phones, Internets, LCDs, GSM…all of these and more will coalesce into a single world-changing event, in effect superficially different but similar to events centuries ago when sound money was everywhere.

Even the most trained people, historians, economists and people as close to Bitcoin as it is possible to be cannot see what is coming.

And that is a good thing.

It is a good thing because people don’t want the world to change, especially if they are very comfortable. If the world goes on as it is for another 40 years, why should they care?

In a phrase, the attitude is, “NO URGENCY”. And it’s completely understandable.

Nevertheless, it’s going to happen. Bitcoin dominance is coming, whether anyone likes it or not.

And that’s a good thing!

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Can you see what is coming?

Yes.

I am not sure if I understand completely, does not matter anyways I am on the train baby!

Are you a fare dodger?

80 IQ

if i can, how about U?

Sounds like you are saying things need to get much worse before it gets better. People are currently too complacent, very relaxed, it won't get that bad. Otherwise we won't get enough people standing up to say no.

Absolutely not. Things are going to get better before they get worse.

They’re going to get better very rapidly, and this will surprise many.

People will say “yes” to Bitcoin.

Many people. And not just westerners.

Bitcoin standard then mandibles?

I do not understand that reference, therefore it is of no importance.

a tecnology then

Bitcoin is not “a technology”. Software is not technology. It is ideology.

Technology refers to the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in tools, machines, and systems that interact with the physical world. In this sense, technology is often thought of as something tangible, like hardware, machinery, or infrastructure.

Software, on the other hand, is a set of instructions that tell the hardware what to do. It is intangible and doesn’t directly manipulate the physical world; it only operates through hardware. Software exists in the realm of logic, algorithms, and code, which makes it separate from technology.

Technology refers more broadly to the physical tools and systems that enable human tasks, with software being an abstract layer that interacts with those tools. Software is a facilitator of technology, rather than technology itself.

The term “technology” refers to industrial and mechanical inventions. Software is a distinct category, as it doesn’t fit the definition of machinery or equipment.

electricity? system

DUUUUURRRRRRRRRRR

k

assett: a usefut or valuable quality person or thing; an advantage or resource

usful

no deletions suc/ useful

not an assett then what? just asking Beautyon not trying to make a point

shit! no sex tonight (0_O)

Meta

Seems like being a part of local bitcoin meetup culture was/is a pretty special thing.

Enjoy it while it lasts!

Yeah that and getting over a thousand SATs for a dollar.

Beautifully articulated. 🙏

THANKS...

That page brought back some good memories from the '70s...

🙏🏻😃💜🫂💖😆👍