If nostr has as much infighting as bitcoin in the long run it's going to be challenging to gain adoption.

If someone is doing something you don't like you can always ignore them.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You can also choose not to ignore them and call them out publicly if you feel itโ€™s warranted and let them either prove their point or make a fool of themselves. No need to be fake ass nice and pretend we all need to just get along.

Fake ass nice is a projection. I am genuinely uninterested.

However, I support your freedom to stay salty ๐Ÿค™

Some fights arenโ€™t worth having. Some are. The tone of your post implies that avoiding confrontation is paramount, which I wholeheartedly reject, as evidenced by my replying to it to state my rejection. ๐Ÿ˜‚ Stay salty, stay passive, stay whatever you want. But people who aspire to be passive find themselves at the mercy of their circumstances.

You are the origin of your circumstances, not other people.

I support your right to argue and I know it serves a purpose.

Avoidance is just the opposite end of attachment. As I see it the goal is to experience neither. That's not to say I have achieved that state in a comprehensive way, but it's a protopian process.

One day at a time.

โ€œYou are the origin of your circumstances, not other peopleโ€ is absolutely false.

That is victim mentality. You can stay there if you wish.

The infighting only matters so much as individual clients allow it to matter. My statement doesn't negate the fact that it's not easy to quickly introduce freedom of association, not only of people but also of your environment.

Nobody can stop me from seeing your words.

Nobody can force me to read them.

Curate your feed.

Don't be afraid to unfollow noisy people, it's not personal. Block those who waste your time. I think even Primal allows you to do that, right?