Do you think the US was basically a functioning democracy in 2008? Do you think the general government was basically structured as described by the Constitution?
I think "No" to both. I think the elected officials have very little control and the real power lies in the institutions, and consequently US democracy is window dressing on an authoritarian system. I think the Constitution is not remotely followed. The Constitution forbids a standing army, vests all executive power in the President, requires only gold and silver as money, and forbids Congress from doing anything at all other than a handful of specifically listed powers.
I view project 2025 as (partially) remaking America in the image of the Constitution, with the likely consequence that judges eventually bring it even closer in line.
I think the US constitution was a reactionary authoritarian document which was written 10 years after the American revolution. The document was the end of American democracy and the founding of the American republic. After the federalists consolidated power there were generations of activists who opened up the republic to some democratic governance over the last couple of centuries.
The Declaration of Independence happened a full decade before the US constitution. The latter represented a major setback. Restoring the American government to the original constitution is something many people want but they shouldn’t call that democracy. It’s a republic governed by a few wealthy men.
What democratic governance?
How is elected officials actually exercising real power less democratic than unelected bureaucrats exercising real power?
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed