...huh?

nostr:nprofile1qqsy86rlt3pvtvfuryalrehjjaqv4g2recqj9zhyh49svf2gx3vqe2sppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0fjdkvm - bitcoin as a "trojan horse"?

https://invidious.reallyaweso.me/watch?v=BUHaQkih4SY&local=true

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

it's a trojan horse to bring wall st and money printer down

did WW say it's a trojan horse for us? so our larping anons get exposed? lmao

got distracted, haven't finished it yet...she's always seemed, shall we say, "cautious" about bitcoin, certainly no die hard (so far as I can tell)

In my opinion whitney webb is a federal disinfo operative

Funny how she came out aggressively against Thiel at the exact time Vance/Trump was being attacked for VC billionaire ties.

Lot's of hardcore maga people were being projected as "distrustful" of Vance after his VP pick.... Then Thiel even went on an apology podcast tour to humanize himself.

Would you rather Thiel -who went on Rogan and described Bitcoin on the same scale as the Internet itself- run the CIA's spyware or someone else?

Epstein disinformation? She literally wrote the book.

When was that

So... after we already knew about Epstein

to build her rep as a double agent lol

She'd been talking about him, Gates, Robert Maxwell, Peter Thiel, and many others, for a long time. I have not yet found any reason to doubt her credibility, but to each his own on this stuff. 🤙

Don't hear her talking about the intel agencies much. Usually she's criticizing people on the "private" side

Well now that I think about it she does always blame the agencies ultimately... anyway I have no data to back up my suspicions

One of the main points of her two-volume work is that while some blame the mafia, and others blame certain three-letter agencies--her argument is that they effectively merged around the 60s. For my part, I think she's been right on. Yes, she can be a little too "black pill" sometimes--but I think she's "directionally correct" far more often than she is not. My two SATS. 😉

hearsay she does deep connection research but never verified, too busy riding the wave!

Well, "Orange" is equal to the number 33 in Full Reduction gematria, "Nakamoto" is equal to 31 (the inverse of 13) in Chaldean gematria.

The name Satoshi Nakamoto, in Japanese, translates to "Innovation from a central point of origin". Could this explain part of why nostr:npub1g0587hzzckcncxfm78n0996qe2s58nspy29wf02tqcj5sdzcpj4q6j40hv thinks that way, or is there more to it than I had just described?