People are still debating about ordinals on Twitter lol
What a sad place
Discussion
Gotta feed the rage machine.
Fuck tweeter
Embarrassing
My eyes can roll back enough.
Ben, I will pay you 50,000 sats, to provide the community a video of YOU watching the linked video below. Your full commentary and facial reactions are required. If #[2]​ is with you in the video, I’ll pay 40,000 sats.
https://twitter.com/theaubservation/status/1633538741045432320?s=46&t=pTiPMNbmaiHDyt9dR60iPA
Challenging offer
in this specific case i don't disagree with Udi. Still, 1 Sat = 1 Sat.
His second point is hilariously stupid. Anyone can write a jpg into a block. That doesn’t make it scarce! If we both write the same image into a block how will we adjudicate the rightful owner? That’s right, through litigation - litigation controlled by external centralized legal structures and entities who supposedly claim they have authority over the rights. How the hell is that scarce?! 🤣
No, he is correct. In ETH you can mint infinite JPEGs in each ERC-20 token contract. In Bitcoin you can only mint 1 inscription per sat (scarce) within the limited bitcoin blockspace - there is a cost to production of each asset. this does mean that the speculative potential is reduced a LOT! So a big fuck you to 10k jpeg scammers.
Please include #[5] and #[6]
Is it like Juneseth said? It's cool to play, experiment but it dies out eventually on its own due to market fee forces? It's an interesting phenomenon to me (someone who doesn't know OP codes or miniscripts that is)
I feel like I can't be against them when I shoved OP_RETURNs via your service onto the timechain myself (that would make me a hypocrite in some ways). Do you have any ordinals Ben?
Okay it was bugging me, so I creeped around on twitter to see if you said anything and found an answer. I feel better now 😄cya
