I'm going to post positive things about #ETH here to see how brutal you all are. I think nostr is superior to farcaster, but that seems to be where the momentum is going over there.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

There are positive things about Eth? I can’t wait to hear this

I apppreciate the expressiveness of solidity and putting more complex programs onto the chain. I admit much of the degen stuff going on sucks, but there are some valuable projects.

Do you think Lightning and Liquid undercuts a lot of that value or those Eth projects will be fine in the long run?

I love lightning, and stuff like taproot assets can beat a bunch of the usefulness of some ETH projects. There are long tail things that are building that will survive for quite some time I think. I'm particularly in the DAO space which I don't see very much discussed in the context of bitcoin.

In the case of DAO, I was excited at first and was one of the people who invested in 'the dao' project.

But from seeing a few projects in action it seems like it all boils down to 'democratising the organisation' through different mechanisms for determining voting rights.

I personally don't think that is a good idea, I prefer anarchy to democracy.

I tend to agree. I think democratic pushes result in poor DAO experiences. I think the ability to form partnerships of n individuals enforced by a smart contracts has some yet seen benefits that are worth exploring. I belive the goal should be directing efforts in a way that isn't democratic but optimizes for actual coordination among the parties involved.

Trolling or because you believe in eth?

I straddle ETH and BTC (though leaning BTC these days). I work on smart contracts and haven't figured out how to make the move to working in bitcoin or nostr.

Good luck to you ser. Nearly every bitcoiner I know shitcoined off the rip. Me too. When you need to make the move, you will.