We need to allow every human do what they are best suited for, whether that means break the norms or follow them.

Then again some norms are needed - a man who identifies as a woman can't go compete with women in martial arts.

yes~!

it's imperative that women be more involved in the world—probably more so than men. we have it backwards in a sense. (and you'll probably hammer me for this lol) but men exist to be of service to women.

women, mothers, are the source of life. and men are to ensure this happens. this is a *supportive* role, by definition. this isn't a lesser role—it's valuable to women and children. it's wanted and needed.

but being the enabler does not mean he is or should be the dictator. nor does being the source of life mean that a woman should be limited to a single role—mother. her insight, expertise, and direction are desperately needed in the world.

The term highest purpose isn't to denigrate other purposes, but to prioritize such that it can be assessed whether one purpose is at odds with another. This just means that if a society is oriented to make it overly burdensome for women to be mothers it is a distorted and mis-prioritized society. On an individual level you may have other goals and you should pursue them.