It really takes a specially severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome to believe that a guy who has absolutely all the three letter agencies, the government, the media, half the country against him, could ever possibly even dream of staging a fake assassination as a PR stunt to pump his numbers after his best two weeks since he won the 2016 election.
Really severe case of the retards, something clinically irrecoverable.
The absurdity of the statements being made right now is thinning my follow list. Children that live life behind screens.
"His ear is intact!"
This is the same sort of people who are often seen in the comments to a shooting complaining that the defender didn't shoot the attacker "in a leg or in the hand". Complete and utter fucking morons who have zero contact with the real world.
Truth. Their real world reference is Netflix.
No doubt
100% this
Do you really think all these powerful entities are unable to kill trump?
Do you think they would allow him to stage something like this?
Answer my question first then ill answer yours
I think, ironically, you believe at the same time that Trump is more powerful than the US security apparatus, and yet you can't conceive that the humans at working for that same security apparatus can simply make mistakes.
You lack a realistic notion of how an assassination plot like this would work. The secret service guys in charge of the security detail would probably NOT be involved and the operation would have to be real.
That means placing the shooters in a way that they would avoid detection by the honest/not implicated agents, and conducting the operation with a very high risk of failure.
You’re making assumptions about me when I haven’t even shared an opinion with you yet. I’ve asked you one question and my question has caused all of these unfounded conclusions about me come out of your mind.
Ironically, you still haven’t answered my simple question.
Do you really think all these powerful entities are unable to kill trump?
You're the one replying to my comment. So make your point or just shut the fuck up and go away.
I’ll answer:
They are capable of doing it
The spectacle is important to them, and most of them would prefer not to if possible (in my subjective judgement)
Since they are at a point where they are resorting to violence after failing with the media and the justice system, they will start trying as long as it cannot be credibly traced back to them (which would be a huge disaster)
Imagine what would’ve happened if we knew real time that JFK was killed by the CIA - they can not conduct business that way
Fair and reasonable view. I wonder if we’ll keep learning new things about this for the foreseeable future.
I’m trying to document things as fast as possible because in the wake of events like this is when you can get the most “real” information.
Unfortunately, in a year there will already be a narrative set in stone, and any interesting information will likely be buried or at least censored. (Imo)
You are 100% right about that. They won’t be able to bury it if it’s on nostr.
Fucking YES! Thanks you!!
Listen, I know that the first thing we wanna think is that it’s some extreme crazy person and it could be but Ronald Reagan was shot by someone to impress Jody Foster. Believe me, they thought it was an adversary politically. You’re assuming that whoever shot him is logical and that very well may not be the case
Things can be incredibly simple or incredibly complex...
Nobody knows anything save those involved.
The simple answer (and most likely) is a nutjob, which isn't necessarily so.
If you know just a bit of how security details work, shooting, and stuff, you will conclude that the simplest and most likely answer is that, yes, it was a semi-random guy -- who got the assistance of a three letter agency. THAT is.
A random amateur simply does not get to carry a rifle and take a vantage point barely 100 yards away from a presidential target surrounded by secret service without help/assistance/someone looking the other way and making sure that nobody looks either. The probability of that would be ZERO.
Plus, to begin with, the "deranged shooter" myth has been debunked way too many times now. There are deranged people who would like to shoot other people, indeed. Taking the final step of making the decision, making the plan, organizing it... for that, more than one has been known to need a "nudge" by an "interested party", if not outright brainwashed and put up for it by them directly.
Questions about the shooter, his motivation and weapon should be secondary. Are we really supposed to believe that the USA cannot protect the leading presidential candidate? There would have been many more incidents if that were the case.
Yeah, that's the point. You just don't get to shoot Trump unless someone is at the very least allowing it to happen, and most likely, based on historical precedent, instigating, organizing and actively helping you to do it.
So, 30% of likely voters!
