π I don't know what's funnier, the use of "high quality men" or that tattoos are a crippling factor to said "high quality men" being in a relationship.
Boys, grow the fuck up.
π I don't know what's funnier, the use of "high quality men" or that tattoos are a crippling factor to said "high quality men" being in a relationship.
Boys, grow the fuck up.
Most guys are just happy to get their balls wet. 
It's like Quasimodo asking if the girl is pretty before dating her
Some people ink, while others do not
He seems to be overcomplicating things
I am not sure whether you are arguing that men refusing women with tattoos are stupid, and that there are no such "high quality men", or something else.
The post you quoted makes perfect sense.
There are high quality men, and there are high quality women, and also their respective low quality versions, and in order to improve the next generation you should try and procreate with the better specimens in the pack.
"High quality" means all around, genetically, physically, and most of all mentally. Virtue is something you need in a spouse to efficiently raise your children.
A tattoo is indeed an indication of low maturity, or past psychological trauma, many tattoos increase so much more the probability of the former to be true.
I am so glad I didn't end up getting a black circlet of thorns on my arm which I started digging after watching American History X quite some time ago.
Did you learn this theory from Tate bro's at Hustler's University?
I'm arguing that it's pretty childish to judge someone's virtues based on how they look. That doesn't reek "high quality man" more judgey and kind of womanly.
By your judgement, all Moari woman are whores and of "low quality" because of face tattoos.
He also says it's fine for a man to sleep around with tattooed woman; good for a fling or whatever, but then takes no moral responsibility for being 'pure' for a woman but expects a woman to remain pure for him. Double Standard imo.