Replying to Avatar DRE

Yes

Prove it.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Try reading a book about the history of civilization?

This is not a controversial statement.

Oh, so a book said it’s natural. Hell, anyone can write shit down.

I’ll reiterate: Your belief that the government Is a “good thing” puts my safety at risk.

I think he is just broad stroking the idea that leaders will always exist.

Not really.

People can study history or have common sense to realize humans have always and will always organize and create governance structures (government) that vary in size and sophistication, or they can remain in a state of bewilderment waiting with their mouths open for government to one day stop existing if they chant retarded mantras enough times.

If you want to live by yourself on an island, by all means.

Leaders don't need to be government. Governance does not equate to interfering. We can cooperate to fix our roads in a town hall with an elected arbiter.

We don't need a government for that.

Splitting hairs maybe. But the difference is huge

No one is talking about leaders. You brought that into the conversation. We are talking about the fact that when humans get together and create a civilization it always comes with the formation of governance structures. Whether people agree with it or not is irrelevant. It’s an emergent property of all civilizations, especially advanced ones.

Libertarian fantasy is not reality.

It would also be nice if everyone was beautiful and smart.

Agreed but that wasn't the point of the original post. Just because something exists does not mean it's good and doesn't endanger someone else's liberty and happiness. Look what happened during covaids.

Agree 💯 not much to add.

Definitions I guess can be interpreted all different ways. I don't mind leaders or governence. However it's not working at the moment.

There will always be normies that need leadership. That is for certain.

Ignorance is bliss. I see why bill gates is trying to sterilize the serfs

You're off your rocker

You were obviously implying that if people stopped “believing” government is “good” then it would cease to exist and your safety would no longer be at risk.

This is stupid because governments aren’t created because people believe they are good. It’s an emergent property of civilization.

I assume you don’t have an objective moral framework anchored in God, so your use of good is purely subjective. Who’s to say your opinion on what is good is any more valid than anyone else’s. Someone can just as easily say that your belief government is either bad or unnecessary is putting their safety at risk. Both opinions equally as ignorant.

Are you really that retarded?

It’s obvious in general, but specifically when learning about the history of humans, that we always create governance structures (government), which become more sophisticated and large the more advanced and large the civilization is.

Whether government is good or not is irrelevant. It will always exist in some form as long as you live among other humans.

You can repeat retarded libertarian slogans all that, but that’s changing exactly nothing.

All day*

Low IQ is putting people at risk more so than any advanced western government.

As we can see