GM☕
As much as I would rather things be peachy
"moving past this"
when you have a default reference implementation of Bitcoin
is actually blanket vote for Core to do whatever they want.
Having just one reference implementation of Bitcoin is a weak link that has worked up until now because trust was upheld.
When the social contract (not respecting the Bitcoin community's wishes) is broken this is no longer the case.
GM☕️☕️🌅💜Run implementation of your choice or don’t update to 30. The market will decide.✌️
I agree.
But part of the market is also the political process that is Bitcoin.
And much of that process is the public discourse.
These are very nuanced and delicate structures
Agreed. Peachy don't have a place here just yet. Bitcoin needs an army of plebs right now. The good thing is, it's getting simpler to spot the perps like the one in your meme.
Right on
Multiple competing implementations has always been inevitable. It was the solution to "but who controls the software that controls Bitcoin?"
Up until now, a clear necessity for that solution had mostly only been theoretical.... but here we are.
GM my friend im too retarded to comment on that discussion PV 🤙🏼🧡
Lol, well, that is kinda relevant
Because we are sort of all trusting someone with a better understanding in this thing.
And even if you don’t understand EVERYTHING, you can understand, and see, how that trust is managed.
If you don’t like core 30 don’t run it. Removing some meaningless aribitrary cap on op_return is not the moral panic Luke dash and his minions think it is. Shit doesn’t matter at all.
Even if that’s true, Bitcoin governance matters.
A lot
There are valid transactions and there are invalid transactions. Deciding that we will no longer accept valid transactions based on the shape of them is changing the rules.
Deciding that we need to rollback the chain because of a transaction we don’t like is madness.
The fundamental argument that 444 makes is flawed. Data on chain is not a liability. It requires external software to make any sense of what that data is. I could design software that reads an arbitrary part of the chain to create images or blocks of text. Run this software continuously and eventually it will recreate Shakespearean plays or state secrets or csam or any number of things. Decoding the data for a JPEG is no different.
The fact that the proponents of 444 are using the threat of legal liability should trigger an immune response so violent that none of the proponents are welcome in Bitcoin culture again.
Core V30 is the change of rules.
Also , what do you think about governance in Bitcoin?
Do you think Bitcoin is strong with only 1 main implementation that operates independently of Bitcoin users?
Nachos Taxos is me so take that as you will.
1. Ima very much old school fuck the system.
2. How you plan on governing the entire world? 🌍 I’ll wait.
3. #GFY nostr:npub1kgfy4n6ejqm68cgsses03gyamarf5z5hjt9r4ymglvtxq8fel7cs7wmgnu nostr:npub1j0atm2tvxu7r97952u7xc3kcyw5fh9y5wxkwcqsywq5jesneqwesla4vsu nostr:npub12yus6jfau5zycuv8rxe6n87llqa3sy09fd7x42df9n3r6fwqrsds37v6eu nostr:npub1swszdcngx3xy6pq3we5qhg9adcjn25y5hjgwjj0vs9w5zvsvnjdsas9ydl nostr:npub1q8j0c2kuplm6q3ja8ectxfnaxa0tus5js2868zy0ju338uapyj8qgs3jxm 👀
It's not about personality! It's about our money. Bitcoin is money not data storage
The knots crowd aren’t stopping data storage they are just moving it deeper into the utxo set adding friction but also more wasted space. They are being over dramatic drama queens and should be slapped a few times to knock some sense into them, and like should shave his beard as it’s the worst in the business.
So the bozos that introduced the original bug for inscriptions are now positive there’s no reason to keep the op_return limit? Yea, I’m gonna pass. Literally nobody needs this nor is anyone asking for it. A small increase? Sure, a few want that but they are all shit that doesn’t matter as you would say
Great morning
gm 🤙
Gm, woof woof
good morning
Gm....
GM, pretty much…….
UASF
Hi, can you explain what you mean by “ not respecting the community’s wishes ? “
Genuinely curious. Cause baby Bitcoin is 16 or 17 & I for one have only seen 3 issues in #core since it began.
Bird up!
Let's start talking more about politics on this platform than talking about Bitcoin Bitcoin Bitcoin endlessly.
