I believe I orange pilled a new friend tonight. When he asked me to explain Bitcoin, the first question I asked him if he was a Republican or Democrat. Depending on his answer to this question was how I planned on framing my responses to his question. While Bitcoin is not political, humans can be.

If he was a Republican: I'd frame explaining Bitcoin around inflation, taxes, separation of money and state, and digital scarcity.

If he was a Democrat: I'd frame my responses around financial inclusion and hope for billions around the world while touching on building a better society with a better monetary system.

If he said neither: Then it's a mixture of both.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Interesting… How do you feel his overall response to your engagement with him was?

I typically like to ask what they know about it already. So I can build from where they are at.

Then once I see there eyes start to glaze over and roll back in there head I pivot to something else 🤣

It was great. He's extremely interested.

Which adventure was chosen?

He said he was conservative.

💯

It’s not red vs blue. That’s a psyop.

Facts

I think that’s Derek’s point. If somebody is programmed, you gotta interface with the right language or you’re taking the wrong mixed simile to the dog hunt.

Right. You have to know your audience.

And it’s at this point I see your 💯 and wish nostr had edit. 😆

😂🤣😂🤣

😂 I mean ya got a good point here

Next time try to approach it by asking what he believes is the core problem with the world today. Try to narrow it down to the root cause and start there. Its easy to transition further down the rabbit hole from there.

Love the tailored response. Wrap it however you want, Bitcoin is for everyone.!

Very good point, I would send a Republican a Michael Saylor video and I would send a Democrat a Ben Arc, or Natalie Smolenski video. A moderate would prob be a Peter McCormack video.

There are many different things to appreciate about bitcoin, not all attributes are for everyone.

Personally I’m always trying to find the balance between them all.

Can also find common ground (in a lot of countries) that bitcoin has the potential to gradually de-monetize housing... Just maybe don't tell a boomer that 😁

Or you could try scaring the boomer by saying bitcoin price appreciation has likely been suppressed so when the launch happens it could suddenly demonetize housing 😁

⚡⚡⚡

That’s interesting. I’m not in either party, but I think the inclusion argument would be much more persuasive to me, just because of the history of abuse and exclusion delivered through the banking system and its regulators.

I believe that the different starting points lead to the same final path. It's about finding a way to reach someone and a lot of time that is trying to understand where they're coming from by asking the right questions and then listening to their responses.