I hope that by adding NIP-95 we start to see truly large (paid) relay operations develop. Many of them will be private, but that's ok for now. It's time to grow.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr.wine already does a great job

While I came to agree with you on NIP-94 in part because it can really help with moderating CSAM and other problems. I completely disagree on NIP-95.

As others have pointed out web sockets aren’t the right vehicle for larger files. And you’re creating a nightmare for anyone trying to take down illegal content. I don’t want Nostr to replicate the legal problems of torrents.

You had mentioned serving things like emojis. Those are small and fit in the current limits of relays. Sure - have it support small files. But I’m totally against larger files.

Nip 95 is going to do the opposite. It is going to make running a relay way harder. This is a terrible idea.

That's false. You don't need to accept NIP-95 events.

So now everyone needs to build in custom filtering just because you want to do something stupid?

Do you prefer I put it directly in kind 1 tags like Will proposed?

Don't upload files on nostr, that's not what it is meant for.

Let's see how the test goes. It might actually work out.

random q, are you from the region of Pamplona, Spain by any chance?

No, but my ancestors are from there.. from the 1600s or so.

I went there back in early 2010s. It was amazing and such a lovely city

The filter there must be is by message size. Anyone who creates a relay and doesn't set a message size limit doesn't know what they're doing

Nooby questions.

Are the costs of running a relay high? Are the outlays high. Would it be a cloud operation?

#[0]

That's what we are testing :)