People want frictionless payments, lightning is heavily frictioned.
Even top Bitcoin, and lightning experts have complained how frictioned of a system it is.
And it's like 80%+ of people who don't self-host their own channels, most people use custody services.
I tried using Zeus myself as well but I decided that using Strike was just easier to do instead.
I know, x, y, and z but if the Feds are going to arrest me for buying pecan butter, and soap then they're being lame weenies.
For, 90% of the global population most will gravitate to L1s that work easily, or utilize centralized custodial services.
Very few, if any will ever utilize self-hosted methods due to the high cost, and technical knowledge required for a fractional improvement in Bitcoin usage.
I didn't say Zeus, is or isn't easy.
I imagine it's better than other Self-Custody solutions but after losing $500 of Bitcoin in lightning purgatory, I'd rather hold a financially regulated institution with engineers liable like Strike for lightning transactions than deal with the hassle of decucking my own Bitcoin whenever lightning breaks.
Zeus is an amazing product, Lightning, not so much.
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed