It’s me back to say more controversial things on the nostr.
Men should provide for women.
Discussion
You forgot to say anything controversial….
Absolutely.
Say it AGAIN SIR 💯💜💜💪💪😄😄
WE NEED PEOPLE LIKE YOU nostr:nprofile1qqsp4lsvwn3aw7zwh2f6tcl6249xa6cpj2x3yuu6azaysvncdqywxmgpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqzenhwden5te0ve5kcar9wghxummnw3ezuamfdejj7mnsw43rzun5d3ckxcfcwgmxzatev9mn2m34dqekcdf5xgexgmf5wde8jdty0fnx2ef5xcunven3v5u8xdn3va6kg6mnxajx5arxwvlkyun0v9jxxctnws7hgun4v5dpfm4n
💯
STFU😠
Nothing controversial here.
Just 📠
What does that look like to you?
For me it’s traditional gender roles, but I’m open to other ideas that don’t involve the redistribution of resources from men to women via the state.
How about emotional support? Because traditional roles don't always leave room for that. That was why a lot of women killed themselves back in the "good ol' days."
I used to be really adamant about traditional gender roles, and I loved being a housewife when the kids were very young. But I'm at an age where the dynamic often flips, as the men are simply worn out and the women are making solid incomes again.
Wake me up when it's actually controversial
And when there is an enemy that is impeding men from providing for women, be it a foreign invader, or, say, a banking cartel, it falls to men to identify and band together to eliminate that impedance.
Women should have a backup plan pending brofluencing failing to make any broad social impact.
Sure, if we’re talking about providing Bitcoin and financial sovereignty 🧡
ok show me the man then.
as far as I can tell, yer all slaves... hard to respect.
tell me where i am wrong.
https://www.williamsandwilliamslawfirm.com/a-treatise-on-the-word-person
Good start 👏 👏 👏
Kudos!
But I couldn’t agree more personally
Women should not provide for themselves.
Fixed it for ya.
I have to go do just that tomorrow. It wasn’t planned but it must be done. Weekend rate is better anyway 🦅
What, all of them?
As an older bloke, I can tell you that the best martial advice I ever got was to not let money problems come into your marriage.
He said that most arguments & divorces occur over money. Keep the money flowing & shield her from any monetary stresses & you'll have a long marriage.
He wasn't wrong but women want more than just a provider. They also want someone to protect them & their children.
But only one at a time.
I'm sorry to see it's controversial.
I think this goes beyond financially - strong men provide/hold space for women to thrive and flourish in their natural gifts. And beyond within partnership but within communities and in the world as well
As a happy wife, I don’t aggree on this one. I am not a feminist, I am feminine, but at the same time I enjoy earning my own money and stacking sats. We split out bills 50/50 and I’m genuinely happy with that. He offered to provide, but I want to pay my part cause I want him to know I’m with him out of love, not money… I think it’s great if a man chooses to provide, but it shouldn’t be an obligation for all men. Also, letting women pay can actually help men to spot gold diggers early on…
I’ll add a disclaimer though: we don’t have kids (yet), so maybe I’ll change my mind later 😅. But for now, 50/50 feels right for us
It seems like an appropriate disclaimer 😅
I believe parenthood somehow completes one’s self, as in giving its true purpose.
When you have kids, remember two pieces of advice of a random Nostr guy: 1, be generous, and have as many kids as you can. There is no greater joy and no greater ROI in life fulfillment. Low time preference always pays off. Al carajo with all those little, close-minded people that have two kids and no more because “it’s enough”. Since when just this love is enough?
And 2, your job as a parent is to raise kids so that they are successful in leaving your nest. So, your number one priority, and the person who will remain after the kids leave, is your spouse. Treat your husband like when you were still dating even when you have kids.
There are few sure ways of ruining a marriage. Forgetting about the spouse and living solely for the kids is one of them.
PS. This applies for husbands exactly in the same way, but you mentioned you’re a wife
Thanks nostr:nprofile1qqsx59l30ml9xfk4nmwywq9qr7t8lg4qxj4zchj89sly02uxa0at49cpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqyy3qwq for your advice! 💜 You sound like a very wise man, will try to put this in practice when kids come!
I disagree but you said it such a respectful way, i felt like a zap was appropriate.
🧡👊🏻🍻
LOL, most of the dudes I know who run bitcoin startups wouldn’t even be able to afford to do it if their wives weren’t financially supporting them.
Yes, but only out of love and admiration, not out of pity.
How bout this one : gendered words (actress, stewardess, etc) **_honor_** women, and the woke assholes are actually disrespecting women by changing the language.
Debunked
This take is like a 3 out of 10 on the spicy meter. 😂
Back in my day, we called men who didn't provide for women...pussies. Meaning "not a man".
Regular.
How many wives are acceptable ?
If ya ain't taking care of her, someone else will 😎
Yes. And buy her something nice.
Thank you 🤝
This might be more controversial on another platform, but if you wanted to draw out some complainers you may succeed in doing that.
That's not controversial, it's universal. Women either believe this explicitly or they believe it because they support taxation to fund welfare. Only the tiniest minority of lesbians don't believe in welfare.
💯 agree and I would really love to be provided for 💯 However, I haven't been united with the love of my life yet... 😌
Not controversial in my worldview. I am yet to experience though.
100%. Why go against thousands (if not millions) of years of evolution?
Very controversial to say that men should do things for women. Stunning and brave, @HODL. Stunning and brave.
Which in turn frees up quality time raising children —> family legacies filled with love ❤️🌟🗽