Who's Gonna Run Bitcoin HardCore 30?
https://blossom.primal.net/171efbc602621b7be443b6c156e30413af488f71a94507d43bacd97517e895cd.mp4
Discussion
Nope.
Just wait until Bitcoinās detractors, fudsters and the legacy media start pushing the narrative that this network is being used to distribute this material.
You thought orange pilling freedom money in the west was difficult beforeā¦ā¦
You are projecting really hard dude.
Are you new here? Matt isn't. He's expressing urgency with clarity at a time where people (presumably like yourself) don't seem to be getting what's going on.
Thanks for all your work on this Matthew - I honestly saw a video you did on this months ago, thought yeah that seems worrying, went on with my life as normal.
Highlighting what mechanic has said recently about CSAM has made me buy a start 9 and get off my ass instantly to get knots- Iāll be adding one more knots node next week.
I still canāt believe everyone isnāt bringing this issue to light and it really shows who understand bitcoin and who doesnāt/ doesnāt care/ takes short term payments over the first global free market ever
Appreciate you š
Also I really hope these core devs use their brains in time to stop this insanity!
Im going to my immediate relative who works high up at a three letter agency in DC.
They will be getting ready.
Hardcore v30 degens can consult with Ross Ulbricht on consequences to certainly online activity.
Unable to send you zaps
I wonder if this is just a negotiation tactic. In the previous video you referenced an X post that listed two reasons why the devs would do this - because theyāre evil or because they want to advance some other business venture. In the post, the former was immediately ruled out leaving just the second optionā¦which, is how all this started to begin with.
In that light, suppose all they needed/wanted was to increase the limit to say 200 bytes (honestly, this has gone on for so long I canāt even remember what the original requirement was). Knowing that a portion of the community would resist even that change, why not go all out and say youāre actually planning to increase it to some astronomical size, let the community drive themselves insane arguing over it, and then, just before shipping the update, make an about face, acknowledge the error in your ways, bend the knee, and set the limit to what you wanted originally?
Thank you Matthew.
Without filters in the dominant implementation and without correcting the Taproot exploit, the blockchain WILL be compromised.
I AM advocating for serious conversations about a fork. Give the VCs their "Etherium 3.0" on the historical blockchain and fork a new chain that fixes the exploits.
Let's see which chain has value
idiot
Thanks for your content!