Avatar
MikeD
7ddacaee42675e69ab3dd5eb353e4b7c60cc141d65f4a546257eb5cc52504e81
On a Mission

Some banking apps don't play nice with Graphine. There is an app setting "Exploit protection compatibility mode" that might help with CashApp

Agree. If it's going to be truly decentralized, there are going to be branching paths.

They have to be allowed and the market (the human supercomputer) will decide.

nostr:nevent1qqs80h5fvxdgxjzrqpk8wuhhrjtpcypkczhevcw2gx02t4hcg3qjqegpr9mhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet59upzq7ves9qkzaplyfusq643pn7c80fn4hlj8jz7tkwsjj0a6c8c7xgpqvzqqqqqqyfe6cx6

The news photo shows the mural directly below a survalince camera. I found that interesting

I think both groups have valid points.

It's true: miners can 'slipstream' spam in to the chain regardless of relay policy.

Also true: relay policy filters and widespread use by relay operators discourage this behavior at scale.

I don't see bad actors, I see different visions. That is decentralization. Both sides will keep working on their vision, as they should, and the market will decide.

Replying to Avatar mobiusmoe

Bitcoin's exchange rate expressed in gold follows a power law trend almost as closely as when expressed in usd (95% vs 96% r-squared)

In past bull/bear cycles bitcoin's behaviour around the power trend line is nearly identical for both measures (green circles).

This relationship has noticeably decoupled in the current cycle:

- the usd exchange rate has risen from long-term support trend line to the power trend line (red circles)

- the gold exchange rate has remained anchored to the long-term support trend line (red circles)

If gold is a more accurate measure of purchasing power, it can be argued bitcoin has not yet entered a bull-run in purchasing power terms

In gold terms, the power law trend line indicates, if a purchasing power bull-run occurs, bitcoin's price may:

- 2x from here to the power trend line (reversion to trend / no bull-run)

- 5x from here to to 1sd-up line (conservative base case bull-run)

- 10x from here to to 2sd-up line (up-side bull-run)

In usd terms, that's an exchange rate of US$500,000 to US$1,000,000 per bitcoin in a bull-run this cycle

This seems unlikely to say the least ... something is broken ... can someone tell me what it is?

npub13l3lyslfzyscrqg8saw4r09y70702s6r025hz52sajqrvdvf88zskh8xc2 npub1rtlqca8r6auyaw5n5h3l5422dm4sry5dzfee4696fqe8s6qgudks7djtfs npub1f4uyypghstsd8l4sxng4ptwzk6awfm3mf9ux0yallfrgkm6mj6es50r407 npub1gkkahxwca30rf2td22u9p3jnmlh79dylgmm2et0kykftle6tdcysj4zden

npub14uhkst639zvc2trx2nlsvk4yqkjp690zk89keytnzgmq2az0qmnq58ez89 npub153xmex42x4chdf757hp3q6zxagykkek7pdgwuwd074964dkyha9s82ryu8

npub1r00t03pv2kxpes5x676xu3j2e0ag8hmmtzv8et0matxg876tnkgsp5sqe8

Gold has caught a bid. Up 90ish% in the current cycle in $USD terms

You can just do things.

You can learn. They are not the authority. Choices

Where is it father's day? It's June in North America.

If you still fiat brain and think that turning Bitcoin into another arbitrary data storage chain is no big deal, study this chart:

I'm also not a developer. I know Knots is not a panacea. I think it's about who constructs blocks too. I agree with the sentiment though. I will not "just stop talking about it". I will continue to learn. I will make informed decisions. I'm not here for fiat number go up

nostr:nevent1qqsdvwax8708eq6j5ak6l4qcxrlvxvg5waguvsnp9xu04nqqv98fzzgpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtczyrdpndwjj8sxa5ym54zmc5mxgzxus2age85ljlfja282vrcldjl65qcyqqqqqqgn5az6p

Without filters in the dominant implementation and without correcting the Taproot exploit, the blockchain WILL be compromised.

I AM advocating for serious conversations about a fork. Give the VCs their "Etherium 3.0" on the historical blockchain and fork a new chain that fixes the exploits.

Let's see which chain has value

I've used YouCut on Android. Just import the video and save. It'll give basic options for quality and framerate. No advanced features but it works

The overwhelming dominant implementation can, yes. If a large majority of block template constructors build blocks that have 5000 byte OP_RETURN then blocks will have 5000 byte OP_RETURN

I understand that. My point is that, as I understand (might be wrong), there should be no OP_RETURN data larger than 80 bytes in the blickchain currently. This would be due to the default setting in Core < 30. Again, I might be wrong. Trying to understand

Therefore it is the action of changing or removing the filter that allows the 100 byte OP_RETURN to make it in to a block? Which is what Core 30 will do?

Victor's point is good, and I think you're all supporting it. Individual choices make the market.

I'm hearing a lot of talk about being held hostage by employers and companies, but that is a choice. Individuals are choosing to go back to the office. They are choosing to live in the cities where the employer operates. It's all choices

Wish I could say I deserve credit. They were an inspiration, for sure. ๐Ÿค