Some banking apps don't play nice with Graphine. There is an app setting "Exploit protection compatibility mode" that might help with CashApp
I'm used to about 96hrs for a full reindex. Lots of CPU cycles to verify all those transactions
We'll see in 7 months when your 5 year chart catches up to the ATH in SOL-BTC
Zooming out doesn't work if you didn't own the asset
Haven't employer's been using software tools to filter CVs for many years now? I've heard of courses being offered to help get past the first big filters.
GM

Confucius say, dev who personally loses ~216 Bitcoin using a retarded / antiquated security setup should not steer the direction of Bitcoin development.
True storyโฆ
nostr:nevent1qqsfkdthv0wenczed8y6fstj3a3f2pwersylmpnsmfm5uzkaxf2dncsesactk
Might say that the developer group who oversaw the Taproot inscription exploit & has yet to fix it, leading to a 50% increase in the size of the UTXO set since implementation, should be questioned about the direction of Bitcoin development
I've used StartOS and this is not true. Knots is in the community registry. You need to change registries to even access it. Changing between Knots and Core is a couple of clicks
September 11th is approaching fast
Would be a shame if we got #IsraelDid911 trending globally before then...
https://blossom.primal.net/288e8cdd02d706c6580bbd792bc3551a709bacca5ef865b79cbea1d197144de0.mp4

What are you going to believe; the narrative or your lying eyes?
Agree. If it's going to be truly decentralized, there are going to be branching paths.
They have to be allowed and the market (the human supercomputer) will decide.
Agree with above๐. No need to redownload the chain or reindex. Just run the other binary
The news photo shows the mural directly below a survalince camera. I found that interesting
Confucius say, dev who personally loses ~216 Bitcoin using a retarded / antiquated security setup should not steer the direction of Bitcoin development.
True storyโฆ
nostr:nevent1qqsfkdthv0wenczed8y6fstj3a3f2pwersylmpnsmfm5uzkaxf2dncsesactk
Failure is the path to sucess
I think both groups have valid points.
It's true: miners can 'slipstream' spam in to the chain regardless of relay policy.
Also true: relay policy filters and widespread use by relay operators discourage this behavior at scale.
I don't see bad actors, I see different visions. That is decentralization. Both sides will keep working on their vision, as they should, and the market will decide.
Data storage can outbid monetary transactions now, 80 bytes at a time.
You don't know what I believe
You can just do things.
You can learn. They are not the authority. Choices
The more I think about it, the more I'm sure a fork will be needed. The exploits must be patched. Better to do it with as short of a timechain as possible
If you still fiat brain and think that turning Bitcoin into another arbitrary data storage chain is no big deal, study this chart:

I'm also not a developer. I know Knots is not a panacea. I think it's about who constructs blocks too. I agree with the sentiment though. I will not "just stop talking about it". I will continue to learn. I will make informed decisions. I'm not here for fiat number go up
Pan pan
Who's Gonna Run Bitcoin HardCore 30?
https://blossom.primal.net/171efbc602621b7be443b6c156e30413af488f71a94507d43bacd97517e895cd.mp4
Without filters in the dominant implementation and without correcting the Taproot exploit, the blockchain WILL be compromised.
I AM advocating for serious conversations about a fork. Give the VCs their "Etherium 3.0" on the historical blockchain and fork a new chain that fixes the exploits.
Let's see which chain has value
GM
Portraits are 21k
DM or comment what you would like painted.
#zapsnag
https://blossom.primal.net/e9bc12eeca32b3d777e79f7f0c40c5b8054d8e9d6e63b1ae14a662c073a80174.mov
Includes shipping? Where do you ship?
I've used YouCut on Android. Just import the video and save. It'll give basic options for quality and framerate. No advanced features but it works
The overwhelming dominant implementation can, yes. If a large majority of block template constructors build blocks that have 5000 byte OP_RETURN then blocks will have 5000 byte OP_RETURN
I understand that. My point is that, as I understand (might be wrong), there should be no OP_RETURN data larger than 80 bytes in the blickchain currently. This would be due to the default setting in Core < 30. Again, I might be wrong. Trying to understand
Therefore it is the action of changing or removing the filter that allows the 100 byte OP_RETURN to make it in to a block? Which is what Core 30 will do?
Victor's point is good, and I think you're all supporting it. Individual choices make the market.
I'm hearing a lot of talk about being held hostage by employers and companies, but that is a choice. Individuals are choosing to go back to the office. They are choosing to live in the cities where the employer operates. It's all choices
Wish I could say I deserve credit. They were an inspiration, for sure. ๐ค
Covered yer bill, pay it forward









