Avatar
John Andrew Owen
088d2457eb6b3af38e9e6c7642657650991bcc88ae1c147dece2f99ce9b8cbed
Maxi

USB C is a standard for transferring power and data.

Bitcoin is a standard for transferring value.

Candlestick patterns are pseudoscience until someone can provide rigorous evidence

In 2017, the CEO of JPMorgan said “if you’re stupid enough to buy bitcoin, you’ll pay the price one day” #bitcoin https://video.nostr.build/32f0a362155e340a0ee4e3c4bc792ca2cd0d1db6372357a161e58b3874eae676.mp4

satoshi created #bitcoin so degens could lose their money on defi exchanges and meme coins

Wish more businesses accepted BTC

Bitcoin-skeptic narrative is changing from “ponzi” to “threatens the global order” #bitcoin

I seem to be able to zap people by going to their profile but not able to zap posts like this one. The zap button on a post does nothing. I’m using the Damus app. Should I use a different app?

Well, let me reframe the question a little. But if you don't think you want to engage, then so be it.

Tether is a pretty useful token, especially in countries where people want something like the dollar but have difficulty accessing it.

Still Tether is a company, so the tokens don't really stand on their own feet, I wouldn't invest in the tokens, you can invest in the company. Also the technology is kind of irrelevant too in some regards, they moved from ETH to TRON and now are using Lightning (unless I'm getting my stable coins mixed up). The company uses whatever resources it can find to provide a product.

There is also the standard risks associated with a regulated company, but it is kind of like a VPN money where the company has limited information about its users so the risks are mitigated to a point.

I think it makes sense to be excited about a public technology like bitcoin or the web, because people can build on it just like companies can.

Tokens are not really technologies AFAIK, they are products, so unless they are technologies that people can either copy or build upon permissionlessly, I think they don't serve a purpose that I am interested about.

I love the idea of tools and technologies empowering developing countries, don't get me wrong, but I'm always skeptical of a product that establishes, whether directly or indirectly, whether known or unknown, a master client relationship where people are not relying on the technology only, but also the existence of some entity driving that technology.

So...

Is there a token or a token standard or a token technology that you can recommend that I read about or look into based on my perspective?

That’s beyond my level of knowledge but maybe taproot assets? Nobody can change them after they are minted. The closest thing to a central authority are the original developers who own the only (afaik) implementation of the taproot assets protocol but I imagine there will soon be multiple competing implementations of taproot assets just like there is with bitcoin and then lightning network.

I could expand a bit and provide some hypotheticals (less developed countries is a big one) but I don’t have a bulletproof explanation for every rebuttal. Nobody does. But nobody did for bitcoin in 2010 or the internet in 1990. It’s technology with capabilities that match big problems we face today. And Larry Fink keeps talking about it so it’s going to happen anyway.

😮‍💨 why do I have to keep explaining this

He mentioned setting up a discord before he left. Probably he won’t be on Nostr. Doesn’t matter though, people are going to quit X and look for an alternative. Some of those people will come to Nostr.

He is a trend setter. This will ultimately lead to more people on Nostr

I’m late to the party. That tracks with how I thought about it

So true. It’s like trying to explain the internet before it was mainstream