Avatar
Jordan S
0c45d7d45edb0fadda4215d36ca0d9aba0c771b85d3717764b8a128d5e443e4d
Terminally online Crypto-Anarchist Schizo that creates, and re-uploads bizarre memes featuring anime goth girls, and cats. Shitcoiner, Spend, and Replace Advocate, Anti-NGU, Anti-HODL culture. Contrarian Against Tyrannical Society. Primary Client: Amethyst Zaps : = True Right-Wing Social Commentary You may find offense from what I post. Bitcoin Silent Payments on Cake Wallet: sp1qqtzml9d42vrapqx2wwevww2p34lg3tgrgq7ncr9ajd93jdcdpyzn5qnj2z9ad657whqssh0kelkudz8yatfjy43wfzrrmdd74wwsrj998qf3upam Bitcoin (P2WPKH): bc1q924kwactpgxl69lp55sstrrjc2qaglzwthrv2y Monero: 4B9KUH9EJSWYRdHxAFkGexJqgCRrajSRniLZ5R4tw2nVGvrdDKttt4K6p6wa2npSyj7rMjWqzdrgmXfbFikzoziUBaQn7vf
Replying to Avatar Sjors Provoost

Reading between the lines here, and over generalizing, gives me two impressions:

1. Reparations mainly serve a political purpose, to make the victor population feel like they're getting sufficient revenge. In reality you want as much economic growth as possible because that's mutually beneficial.

2. Although Germany probably could have paid them, they didn't want to, and the sense of humiliation helped Hitler rise to power.

On (1):

> Germany would have to pay reparations for the devastation caused by the war, but would not pay for actual war costs.

> This figure [equivalent of $1 trillion today] was divided into three series of bonds: "A" and "B" Bonds together had a nominal value of 50 billion gold marks less than the sum Germany had previously offered to pay.

> "C" Bonds, comprising the remainder of the reparation figure, "were deliberately designed to be chimerical", with the Germans being informed that they would not be expected to pay them under realistic conditions. They were "a political bargaining chip" that served the domestic policies of France [which wanted more] and the United Kingdom [wanted less]. The figure was completely unreal; its primary function was to mislead public opinion "into believing that the 132-billion-mark figure was being maintained".

> Despite domestic pressure for a harsh settlement, British Prime Minister David Lloyd George opposed overbearing reparations. He argued for a smaller sum, which would be less damaging to the German economy with a long-term goal of ensuring Germany would remain a viable economic power and trading partner.

> "Germany financed its reparation payments to Western creditor nations with American loans", which the British and French then used to "cover their long-term interest obligations and to retire their wartime debts with the United States."

> Germany's payment of reparations during the 1920s was funded mostly through foreign loans.

On (2):

> As a result of the [Young Plan], German payments were half the sum required under the Dawes Plan.

> Hugenberg's proposed law called for [...] the rejection of the Young Plan

> 5.8 million people out of 6.3 million voters voting in favor of the law. This fell below the required 21 million votes (50% of eligible voters) in order for it to take effect. While this was a political defeat for Hugenberg, it did result in significant national attention for Adolf Hitler, who had worked with Hugenberg to promote the referendum

> Reparations played a significant role in Nazi propaganda, and after coming to power in 1933, Hitler ceased payment of reparations

Also interestingly this whole thing took until 2010:

> A final installment of US$94 million was made on 3 October 2010, settling German loan debts in regard to reparations.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I_reparations

The thing wasn't about pride, it was about the fact that Germany literally could not because most of their economic output was destroyed during the war.

It was an unrepayable debt at the time.

That's what caused Hitler's rise to power because people were struggling, young mothers would bring their daughters to engage in prostitution just to survive, the currency was so worthless they used it as wall paper.

This wasn't oh Germany were poor loser, it was a survival instinct.

The basic premise of investing that regardless no matter how safe as an asset is there can, and will be events which cause that asset to lose value, this is also true for currencies.

It is always wise to be diversified.

The CCP is Currently The Biggest Global Threat to Global Free Trade, and Prosperity.

The more that we can focus on defending our country economically from China the better we can stop its allies from causing chaos elsewhere.

Russia is fueled by China's economic powerhouse, Iran is powered by China, Warlords in Africa are powered by China.

It's time for The United States to engage in radical free trade instead of Tariffs.

Tariffs will kill The United States, and ensure our loss to China.

Its hard to say, I think generally they wouldn't because it's cost ineffective to do so.

But I'm sure there are people who could utilize as a tool for leverage, I would say Collateralized Debt Obligations in a way function similarly to that.

My point however is Bitcoin's value from scarcity is an issue that prevents it from being used as digital cash, which is what it's intended purpose was.

Could be diagonal 🤔.

Jokes aside, I think all those terms, and visualization are tools that help people understand the data being processed by the blockchain.

It's hard to quantify how energy, data, and information is quantified in practice.

Ok but before we put everyone on a cryptocurrency standard can we at least make sure they're literate first?

The global inflation crisis really makes you realize how much of global finance is tied to the dollar.

You're not supposed to "Stack", or "HODL" Bitcoin, you're supposed to treat it like you would normal currency.

Spend it on day to day things, save some for emergencies, and save some for retirement.

Money needs to circulate throughout the economy in order to create, and provide value for people, a currency that does not circulate is worthless.