Yea, soon screw drivers and shovels.

There really haven't been any credible claims coming out proving such atrocities, but that seems to just be my two cents. 😏

oh wow, i guess i really am “that young” then, getting to use a computer when i was 4 or 5

Just read an article where

51 precincts throughout the country

Are closing…. Umm 🧐 what’s going on?

woah, straight to youtube?

what was the first ever social media/online account you ever created?

i think it must’ve been microsoft outlook and msn for me 🤔

Yeah, thats one of the rhetorical problems liberty minded people have an issue with when communicating the philosophy.

Its so much easier to talk about The State. As opposed to saying the individuals that make up The State that think they're better than the constituents at assessing what they need on a day to day basis.

Its a whole mouthful makes a conversation into a lecture

After looking up the phrase, I understand that I'm being a bit literal with my reference to the phenomenon. "Bread and Circuses" are generally bad, especially when not addressing legitimate issues.

Complaints about Bread and Circuses are warranted. Though the concept works the same when on the up-and-up.

Improving living conditions and reducing discontent is done by improving economic conditions. Hard to stir up political discontent when more products/services become available at lower prices.

Its so much easier to love a faceless entity than individuals lol

Everyone wants to help the homeless until they're stepping in human poop and dealing with an outdoor Psych ward

I still need to refine my thinking on this. My understanding is that Anarcho-Capitalism and its Ethical implications tie closely with the Christian ethic.

Politics have always been influenced by religion/ethics. Politics being the practice of what ought entities do in the face of scarcity.

Any other Political System doesn't give the freedom of association, citizens cannot opt out unless its an AnCap situation.

I saw that if someone prescribed to just being an AnCap, they'd run into the problem of Moral Relativism. There is no particular reason other than they think respecting an individual's Private Property is preferable and should be secured by decentralized violent entities, whether its the individual or private security firms.

Why should we respect other people's private property and not coerce others? Because every human is a creation of God in his image, given the Freedom to Sin and disobey his wishes.

I say this, probably triggering Christians in the process. Even if an action is immoral, does not mean it should be illegal.

Its essentially defining which social problems require intervention through violence as opposed to cultural/economic change. People have the right to defend themselves but not to steal the things of other people.

No, I think discrimination is perfectly fine. There's so much rhetoric in certain circles that discrimination is essentially antihuman, though I suspect these people have a lack of introspection in their life. Hesitate to use the term, but NPCs who follow a trend to fit in.