Pls look at my response to Hanshan. I'm not trying to debate, just wanted to offer an example to Hodl's original idea. Please do look up the Rosenau experiments from the "Spanish flu"- that was quite enlightening for me.

Funny enough I haven't been "sick" since I stopped believing in viruses and germ theory years ago

Everyone is free to believe what they want

Its worth taking a look at the terrain theory of disease. All "disease" is caused by toxicity or deficiency.

Toxicity could be heavy metal overload, unclean water, pesticides/herbicide exposure, pfas, harmful radiation/nnemf, etc

Proof of transmission of viruses has never been done. Just look at the tests during the Spanish flu by Dr Rosenau that showed fluid swapping from sick to healthy patients didn't produce disease

The foundations for virology, and thus the entire field of virology, is pseudoscientific.

Pseudoscience is anything claiming to be scientific that doesn’t follow the scientific method. In every single "viral isolation" paper — which is the foundational evidence for the field of virology (of which all other pieces of virology and also the field of vaccinology are built upon), a variation of this procedure is followed:

snot/blood/other fluids from a sick person assumed to contain virus particles (but never verified to contain virus particles) is added to viral transport medium (VTM). At a minimum VTM contains fetal bovine serum (FBS), amphotericin B (a nephrotoxic antimycotic) and gentamicin (a nephrotoxic antibiotic). Nephrotoxic means “toxic to kidneys”, by the way. That’ll come in next.

After this, they take that mixture (a sample of snot/blood/other fluids and VTM) and add it to a foreign cell line that has been kept alive via unnatural means in a lab, typically VERO E6, VERO CCL81 (kidney cells from an adult green monkey) or human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells.

Then, after that mixture is added to the cells (or sometimes alongside adding the mixture or just before adding the mixture) the nutrient serum for the cells, FBS, is reduced from 10% to 2% (and sometimes to 1% or 0%), effectively starving the cells of their food. They also add gentamicin (sometimes geneticin) and amphotericin B to the culture. Again, these substances are known to be nephrotoxic (toxic to kidneys), and they're being added to kidney cells, where it's assumed they have no negative effects on the cells and are simply there to keep the environment free of fungal and bacterial growth.

The cells then break down, experiencing what is called the cytopathic effect (CPE), which is cell injury or death. The sample is then prepared for electron microscopy, (which is another MAJOR problem in and of itself where many of the resultant particles are claimed be viruses)

https://rumble.com/v674tqy-e141-reframing-the-infectious...

This process is pseudoscientific (and absurd) for the following reasons:

The scientific method requires an observed natural phenomenon. Full stop. That menas you observe something happening in nature. The moment you take something out of its natural context, it's no longer an observed natural phenomenon (this is especially the case when excising tissue from a complex physical, chemical, emotional, electric, etc. entity, throwing a bunch of shit on it in a lab and assuming it tells you something about natural world is absurd).

However, in the case of so-called "infectious diseases", you might say that you observe two or more people getting sick in the same space with similar symptoms. In my mind, that is a justified observed natural phenomenon. After that, you form a hypothesis. For example, “I think Y phenomenon (dependent variable) is caused by X particle (independent variable)."

In order to proceed to test that hypothesis, you need to have X, the presumed cause, the thing you think causes Y, in order to vary and manipulate it to see if it produces the observed effect in question. That is arguably the most important step. In order to follow the scientific method, you need your independent variable, X. Virology has NEVER shown that "X" exists.

Contagion is a myth, and the only virus is in our minds. The cognitive dissonance when I heard this the first time was strong. But but, I've been taught my whole life to fear these things that are out to get me. Its been liberating to know its nonsense.

Believe whatever you want, just felt it was important to lay this out for others to look into with a discerning mind. Lots of resources on the subject if there's a desire to look..

I wish anyone who read this far health, wealth and wisdom. Be well

I believe you did those things, but have viruses been shown to exist using the scientific method without using cell cultures? I can't find a single study or paper that proves that most foundational fact

This quote from Dr. Jordan Grant sums up my issues pretty well:

"I can promise you all right now: you will not find a SINGLE paper in the history of virology which has found the 'thing' inside a human being (or animal), taken that THING as the independent variable in a legitimate experiment, and proven it CAUSES the disease being studied.

That is what is necessary.

When we ask for this, and they give us the cell culture question begging nonsense, you realize it quickly that they have nothing, otherwise they'd be giving us the true scientific papers. It should be easy, if they're there...and they're not.

They do not get off the hook by begging the question. Meaning, they say "virus" as if this entity was ever PROVEN to exist, yet they cannot give you any original papers where such a thing was done.

INSTEAD, they simply PRESUPPOSE (beg the question) that this entity is real, and then engage in their cell culture nonsense and claim the EFFECT they see is "proof of the virus".

This is a logical fallacy. It is affirming the consequent, only worse, because their antecedent hasn't even been shown to EXIST.

For example, if I said "if it rains, my car will be wet. My car is wet, therefore it rained" - this would be a logical fallacy. But the "rain" is known to at least EXIST.

With viruses, it's simply "if my fairy tale belief is true, we will see XYZ in a cell culture. we DO see XYZ, therefore my fairy tale belief is true".

It's the worst form of affirming the consequent because it also incorporates unproven premises.

This is the STANDARD for virology.

once you get this, you can dissect any paper.

IF they claim "we know the virus is there because of the CPE", ask them which paper ever proved that a virus caused CPE, and where "virus" was proven in the first place. You don't get to claim an EFFECT is proof of anything without the antecedent"

His class video about secret societies and Israel is worth watching as well

There will be strings attached, believe that.

You guys have any of those rare earth minerals down there by chance?

They don't test any of their presuppositions that have been given to them. First principles may have been a poor word choice, sorry

One good example is virology. People who work in that field don't realize that viruses have never been proven to exist. They just accept the belief that they exist and build their life's work on that foundation of sand

In order to say that x causes y, you must first prove the existence of x. X in the case of virology hasn't been proven.

Just an example that will cause a lot of cog diss for most reading this. Pls go look it up for yourself if you don't believe me

I can tell something has shifted bc multiple text threads have been taken over by politics.

My question to the ones who bring it up is "have you been watching more news lately, or on the algos more than usual?" The answer is always yes

Then I drop my 'the entire state apparatus is illegitimate' seeds, and wait to see if any sprout patiently

GM fine people of nostr 🌅

Your friendly reminder that these are the good old days!

Compartmentalization and blindly trusting first principles are probably the biggest culprits for this

100%. Pride (and lack of humility) tends to come before the fall- so I am the most bearish on Bitcoin since I bought my first sats

Feels like the same incremental destruction of liberty that the government uses to control people and outcomes (not a perfect analogy but same vibe)

Segwit, taproot, now op return..

It’s just..

Don’t worry…pats head condescendingly

The devs know what they’re doing..

Spam is already getting through..

Trust the science..

I’m a retard when it comes to technical details but I am good at pattern recognition, so my nonchalant “Bitcoin don’t care” attitude is quickly shifting

Just some modern day American statecraft STRATEGERY on display

Lots of freemasonry symbolism the last few weeks, and I haven't looked deeply into the CK details and watched none of the memorial service.

Here's a few I noticed in the limited media I did see..

33 hours to capture the CK "shooter"

Erika Kirk's ring with the Freemason G

The 3 (47) hats that were lined up at CK's debate (11+11+11=33). And the 47th problem of Euclid (aka Pythagorean theorem- square your square. Method Freemasons follow when laying foundations)

Of course the video is 33 seconds long

On their third round of "covid", but at least its not long covid this time!

There are 5 couples in our life that are either separated or actively getting a divorce rn.

Two of them have young kids. Sad stuff

I wonder if this is a widespread trend this year?

Cause most years nobody we know split up

How isn't that self evident yet?

Sadly there will be more FA before FO happens

Don't go in there for about 35, 45 minutes!

Could be doing it with the other hand for 33.

Lots of other 33s with this situation

Mos def, the FAFO chart will be relevant for all the bitcoin treasuries at some point

Similar vein

I’d guess they have solid blackmail material on him and he’s just done what he’s told

You're thinking about this rationally from a free market perspective. But do you think a state would ever seed compromising "data" and not care about paying 4x? Then people "hosting" that data on their nodes could be held liable, de-incentivizing node runneing and leading to more centralization and control

I haven't followed this discussion closely so if anyone has an answer to that I'm all ears

If you believe that, then that will be true for you..

I choose to pay property taxes to have access to the services that the local govt provides.

If I wanted to be an absolute purist and negatively impact all of the people that rely on our homestead I could properly file for allodial title to de-tether from the state but no longer have access to firefighting, electricity, water, sewage, trash, etc.

Its just a different level of self ownership and sovereignty that doesn't just impact me so its not my place to force it onto others who rely on those services

Or visual memes without text?

Conspiracy analyzers get another one right.

If anyone in the UK happens to read this: do not comply and mock them relentlessly in the process

Gotta get the wording right silly goose!

Fitting profile photo: all the world's a stage (for psyops)

Yea I think I saw that one. Basically everyone in the aftermath of the "shooting" is standing around acting like they're doing "medical looking things" cause they think its all for still photos and not video?

From the best Pink Floyd album IMO

Waters above or waters below? Who's to say

Vax- clotshot

There are still a few chats on telegram that I reference as a sort of library of Alexandria for truth topics. Just a matter of time before those are kyc'ed or edited. The sad part is most of the YT links were dead, which just reinforces what you were saying.

My wife and I have made a concerted effort to buy and hodl every esoteric book, documentary, and resource that we can get our hands on.

Also have downloaded many pdf's of valuable knowledge on multiple devices.

Sometimes I picture us as sorta like Celtic monks keeping the old knowledge alive. A lot of it will become homeschooling resources where our kids can learn and come to their own conclusions

I appreciate the fat zap, definitely the biggest I've ever gotten by 10x. I'll spread it around generously 👊

Nostr is the spot for people who value freedom and sovereignty, but sadly most value comfort and ease over those. Hence the society we live in

Whenever I think humanity may be ready for freedom/anarchy (no rulers) I just need to drive through a busy suburban strip mall parking lot and that faith quickly fades away lol

Shitcoinonomics

Hey they want what's best for humanity, right?

I truly don't understand how people listen to altman speak for 2 minutes and still use chatgpt with a clear conscious

There are a few threads with some great npunbs, I'll see if I can link them in a separate comment. In the meantime here's some good ones

nostr:nevent1qqsfhll6vrufzzr4xncxjkdls3zzky3tza2azm5g5p0pkzykyaslu2spzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyp2xpyzg9pxj59gu3hmztaqv8zw5y0ks2l7wlynahzy4d55wy2aqxqcyqqqqqqgsh9wag

At the end of the day your best bet is to look at who some of your favorite npubs are following (especially the ones that are selective and just a few hundred at most). Takes work its but worth it to get solid signal

Like who? Genuinely asking

Thank you. The downsides of owning things

Similar vibe..

More and more I'm seeing this current world from a spiritual perspective. There's a lot of darkness these days but the only remedy is the light. I see free speech as a large component of the light.

Another is love, so we gotta show love to those around us and even those we don't agree with.

Its really our best weapon against the efforts to subjugate humanity to darkness.

We're all children of God at the end of the day, even the unhinged ones lol

RIP Charlie, hopefully goodness will come from this tragedy 🙏

Thanks for the vlog, Hodl- that opening clip definitely hit me in the feels bc a joyful hug from our kids is one of the best things in this life

Well said. It starts with all of us