Avatar
Green Astronaut
1187b773e66d5ed99defeddb40ed038a01990ae1cbd3f4cb54dd03fe41257c10
Olha pra cima

Sorry to brother and potentially mess your business, ppl need to hear though, veganosm and healthier you is impossible

Por isso a democracia nao funciona... Os NPC/idiotas uteis/analfabetos funcionais/mongoloides que escolhem, e estes sao 80% da população...

Replying to Avatar HoppeAna

😱

O dia q a panela de pressão brasileira explidor, eu dou os satoshis pra gasolina...

Replying to Avatar Rajat Soni, CFA

Why would sovereign nations want to hold US government debt if they know they will be repaid in devalued dollars?

#Bitcoin    is a much better solution for long-term savings.

Example:

If you hold $100 billion of US debt for 30 years, you'll be paid back in dollars that are worth SIGNIFICANTLY less. You'll get interest payments along the way.

Right now, 30-year Treasury rates are around 4.34%. If the money supply is inflated by 7% on average over that time (this number has historically been much higher - it keeps up with the S&P 500), the bondholder would lose ~2.7% to inflation per year!

In 30 years, at maturity, the bondholder would receive $100 billion (in nominal terms). The holder would also receive ~$130 billion in annual interest payments throughout the 30 years.

The $100 billion payout has a present value of $11.3 billion. The interest payments have a present value of $51.1 billion, so the bond is actually worth only $62.4 billion in present value terms.

The bondholder would have LOST ~$37.6 BILLION by saving in US treasuries.

Why would you pay $100B for something worth only $62.4B?

If the investor put 5% of their portfolio in Bitcoin - $5 Billion in Bitcoin and 95 billion in bonds - their portfolio would perform SIGNIFICANTLY better.

Bitcoin has historically returned 100%+/year, but let's be conservative and say it will return 20%/year for the next 30 years.

The 5% allocation would be worth $1.19 trillion. The portfolio would be worth almost $1.8 trillion.

Instead of taking a compounded -1.5% annually (a 1.5% loss),

The portfolio would have returned 10.1% annually (a 10.1% gain).

Democracy is the problem all arround

I think they prefer trump....because once a RFK sitting president show USA that a lifelong democrat can make it better for right and left wing citizens, America would never vote for a biden type of guy ever again...

The Xiaomi Truclean... You allready have 3 dogs...let the CCP in.

Yes you are correct... You can BE tired or anything physical or not and its a "estar" i miss that

I used to smoke for years, and eat carbs and sugar like a maniac.... I quit smoking.... But carbs are waay harder...like 50+x harder

"ser" is about being something or someone...example i want to be a cop" this "be" would be translated to "ser"

"estar" is about somewhere...example i wanna be at the police station" this "be" would be translated to "estar". The key point is the word "at" if its a "be at" or something similar you use the verb "estar"

Só complementando....é muito gain comprar um imovel com parcela de mil real considerando que mil reais logo vai ser troco de pão...se eu pudesse eu comprava 10

Aí é osso....pior parte q nem é tua msm...o estado pode tirar de ti...mas ai menos o valor da parcela mensal é mais barato q um aluguel? Pq aqui na minha região qql ap do minha casa minha divida q custa 450 por mes, o aluguel custa 800/900/1000

Acha valido usar, se possível, destes beneficios para gerar impacto negativo no leviatã?