Yes, I watched the video, it doesn’t prove anything. All it shows is a man holding a bottle with holes and dropping it. There’s no direct evidence here that supports the Earth moving upwards, just a demonstration of how buoyancy works in that specific context.

The stationary flat Earth model doesn’t need gravity to explain why things fall, it can be explained by density differences and the natural forces at play in a fluid medium. Objects fall or sink because of their relative density, not because of some invisible force like gravity.

In the Flat Earth model, we don't rely on gravity to explain density or buoyancy. Instead, buoyancy and density are understood as a result of the natural properties of matter. Less dense objects float in more dense fluids, because the denser medium pushes them upward, not due to any force pulling them down, but because of how the materials interact.

All you have is "theory" I have yet see some concrete physical evidence that directly support your claims. Theories are interesting, but they don’t carry the same weight as hard evidence. If you have any sources or experiments that prove the Earth is moving upward or that gravity works as described in mainstream science, then show me but I already know the answer.

You're not able to show me and physical evidence that the earth is a globe or moving.

I see more likes than zaps. What's wrong with you guys?

You're right that buoyancy and density are effects of a force, but they don’t require the Earth to be moving upward. Gravity, or a similar force, causes density differences in all fluids, and it works regardless of whether the Earth is moving or stationary.

The concept of density layers, like the thinner air on mountains, can be explained by the natural distribution of gases in the atmosphere, not by the Earth moving upward.

As for the Earth moving up to explain water being level, there’s still no evidence of a curve at large scales, whether you're on a flat surface or a sphere, water will settle at a level due to gravity. In free fall, you’re weightless because you're in a state of constant acceleration, not because the Earth is moving upward.

So, while you can repeat experiments, the results still don’t conclusively prove one model over the other, especially when you consider the lack of observable curvature and movement in real-world tests

Alerta, Alerta? Linksgrüne Kulturrevolution bald in Zurich?

Sozialistische Experimente zur Abwicklung der Wirtschaft! Endlich Armut für alle. ✊

the way water behaves doesn't prove Earth's motion or curvature. The concept of buoyancy doesn't rely on the Earth pushing water up, it's about the density differences between fluids. On a flat Earth, the same principle applies.

Also, the idea of water being "inert" makes sense if we’re considering that objects don't accelerate because the system is stationary. The idea that the Earth is "catching up" doesn’t explain why we don’t see any curvature in large bodies of water, or why the horizon remains level at any altitude.

as for your box truck experiment, gravity and buoyancy would behave the same way whether the Earth is flat or spherical. So while these experiments are valid, they don’t conclusively prove one model over the other.

Is it guaranteed to sink? 😂

Buoyancy shows density differences, but it doesn't prove the Earth is moving or curved. If the Earth were a globe, we should see curvature or motion, but experiments like observing the horizon show it's always level and rises to eye level, no matter how high you go. The supposed movement of the Earth is too subtle to notice in daily life, and tests like this don’t align with a rotating globe.

Closet homo is not a phrase you hear much these days 😂

I'll be live in ~1 hour. #zapstream #gaming

How do I upload a vlog on nostr without it being a huge file?

Compress? I've seen this.

But how.

#asknostr

Excellent. 49 states to go.

A new mountain is rising from the ocean. 😯

What do you mean the earth is moving upwards? Can you send a link or video of your theory? I've never heard of your theory

Dude, are you trying to tell me that the Earth is flat or what?

Dude, you're the intellectual, I'm just a broke ass blue collar. Use your own words if you have something to say.

What's the funny part?

I think you can check out my profile and decide for yourself. It's fairly easy to know.

The FE community? What FE community?

Is it possible you are talking about The Flat Earth Society?

That is a black hat run society meant to discredit the flat earth truthers.

I've ran into them several times online. I know their tactics be careful around them.

Flat Earthers don't really agree that there is 1 theory. It's not like Bitcoin where there is 1 standard. The whitepaper.

There is no Flat Earth whitepaper. There is no way to prove it because governments won't allow us to investigate. All we have is our eyes and the evidence around us but it's fairly certain that it is not the heliocentric model that was invented by the fake science.

Torrent 😉

There is all kinds of different flat earth theories but most of them make more sense then the globe earth theroy. There isn't just 1 theory and 1 map.

Another interesting bit of information that got me thinking. Remember last week I posted about how the bank of Thailand decided to protect over 65s from scams by limiting the amount they could transfer? A week later the UK is suddenly talking about the same thing and for the same reasons. It's just like the pandemic where every country seemed to decide on the same absurd thing at the same time.