Yes! This is the kind of idea. re: parallel development. -- I like this.
You know what else occurs more broadly re: implementation of Governance questions and approach. Recently there was an interesting difference in the way in what an NIP (94?) which lead to occurred in close 'temporal-proximity' to (NIP95? - Data on nostr relays related(?)). I wonder....if prior to the actual implementation of the code...the initiation of the 'upgrade/implementation event' triggered a 24hr 'community review and audit' ... OR if it was major...what if a certain percentage of participant community/sensible threshold of agreement with the inaugural implementation of major NIPs for example. --- Just kinda ...rambling aloud bringing known variables and 'problems' together a bit. ---- Gn!
Damn...didn't mean to the resend--anyway....But in this way, the consumer and product/service come very close to something like a co-development --
It would be an interesting thing to try to integrate with some sort of 'bounty'/reward system - one might expect 'teams' could develop? And We could make the coding and discussion a spectator and commentary 'e-sport,' garner support and identify consumer needs and problems, circulate sats and create economies globally, collectively solve problems - they often yield to many and myriad minds...
You know what might be interesting? --- A Parallel / Private developer environment & dashboard. To allow public and private 'live' collaborative code and development. -- The definition of problems and logical errors or potential inconsistencies, or a self-referential loop that a little too small here or there kinda thing. -- A 24hr live -global space- to develop, trouble-shoot, problem solve, collectively in simultaneity. -- Just THAT tacked onto a GitHub clone ... Could prove to be - a compelling developer environment, conducive to broad accord, cooperation, understanding, and organically integrate multiple perspectives and approaches to a problem and have that 'forged' into the code of a given 'Project(s)' approach. -- Just an 'off the top' thought re: Inducement to developer participation.
'To better come to understand Self & Circumstance' - Cheers indeed; though perchance a bit more 'green.' -- Huzzah.
Ah! - Welcome indeed! -- 'Scientia potentia est'
Yes, intrigued to learn more about the fees; unexpected upon first attempt to 'zap.' -- Makes sense now, a piece of the value of running a node locally...
I too have encountered this and will follow your example in endeavoring to learn; thanks for the reminder!
#Bitcoin out here with that 'Dylan Thomas' energy @ 'Rage against the dying of the light' -- ! Love this.
Wow -- interesting typos.! ---- *being a bit exhausted, *to understate
Love this. -- Yeah. I went with the 'not suffering fools' approach coupled with just being a bit at having to engage in 'discussions' that really should be simple statements of facts with people about 10 years ago. -- Unfortunately, about 17-18% of the population with a good bit of money coupled with 'effective propaganda and bots' have been able to convince another 32-33% that they are actually 50-51%. And the madness spreads .... -- Seems that the time has come where we MUST because the alternative is at this point...to understand...increasingly untenable.
This! -- Tax code for instance is ridiculously bloated. -- To radically improve the situation for greater than 90% of the US population. Consider - vast majority makes less than 100k, very few make 1,000,000 per year. --- If one is making say $40,000 a year they should 'owe' a symbolic $1 'Citizen Tax' to help with paperwork kinda thing. -- If one is making $100,000 just to keep it simple say we take a progressive taxation scheme that hits 7% or so at 100k and say this increase to 10% up to $1,000,000. --- That general idea could fit on a post-it note, would be easy to understand and implement and would cover 90-something percent of the US population. -- And I think it should be structured such that regardless of where the income is from for the most part. -- By taking away the intentional complexity we gain alot more clarity of direction and understanding of where we actually stand re: tax base etc. -- This is of course, precisely WHY these things bloat to several pages...to cover the loopholes and BS for a privileged few.
Annie with facts. -- The content, import, 'truth quotient' and general strength of argument and statement of position is something at which Jack excels. -- There is not a valid rebuttal to his general position re: import and potential of Bitcoin/Lightning/Blockchain, and this will be manifestly plain to all who listen with an objective mind and earnest intention to understand and pursue an equitable and optimized outcome.
'Hoodie -Suit' Jacket it is - business/bs on the outside, with culture/truth underneath. -- A dash of 'When in Rome' with a sprinkle of 'I came as one of you, to discuss a better way...' -- You got this my man and We got you. -- Let's get it!
