Avatar
5-MeO-DMT
150db8a6fa02131acb4ca23e4516ee6c433dfe8bd261e340285a0f878d2432eb
Trying to do my part
Replying to 06eb267f...

Our fundamental problem is capitalism.

As an environmentalist, I tend not to buy things that I don't need. My daughter knows better than to ask for lemonade at the fair because it'll come in plastic. We brought water bottles for a reason. She can drink that perfectly fine.

She knows I get annoyed at grandma buying all that plastic trash from the dollar store because it gets played with a few days and turn into landfill.

This behaviour is terrible for the economy. The big businesses need infinite economic growth. They need us to buy 3% more trash a year. We have so much stuff that there are industries making legit coin storing our trash that we will realistically never use again. We have entire sectors that make a lot of money off of throwing out our trash for us.

Environmentalism means that many of these new industries will disappear very quickly. It means that fossil fuel billionaires will lose a lot of wealth very quickly.

Does this sound like a system that will change because we sent some politicians backed by rich people to a summit somewhere to talk about it?

The reality is that billionaires' wealth is at stake and they would take complete social and ecological collapse before a dent in their wealth. They want the entire ship to go down believing that they have enough flotation devices they'll come back out on top.

It's not that billionaires don't believe in climate change. They just lied to enough people to convince them of it. They plan on taking advantage of climate change eliminating a lot of the population so they have more resources for themselves.

This is nothing short of murder with a borrowed hand.

#ClimateCrisis

You contradict yourself. Initially, you argue, “Big businesses need infinite economic growth.” Later, you claim, “They plan on taking advantage of climate change reducing the population to have more resources for themselves.” How can they achieve infinite economic growth with a significantly reduced population?

Moreover, if climate change were to reduce the population, it would likely be the poorest who suffer the most, as they control the least resources. This wouldn’t necessarily leave more resources for the wealthy. Additionally, who would be left to work in their factories?

While I agree that there is an excessive production of unnecessary plastic products, I don’t believe capitalism is to blame. What we currently have isn’t true capitalism. It’s a system where profits are privatized while losses are socialized. It also directs significant public funds into the military-industrial complex, which is a major contributor to pollution

It’s astounding how often, when people tell me they meditate, that it is not this.

It’s all about balance. If we fuck with the balance too much, we get balanced. That’s nature’s law.

The only thing up for debate is how much we can disrupt things.

…and then you get a waiter who winds up being a smarmy, obsequious, manipulative fuck.

Contrast that with the European system, where waiters are paid a liveable wage, get 5 weeks vacation and healthcare. They don’t depend upon, nor expect tips. You get a real person and you have time to sit after your meal and digest…

Yes, fucking criminal!

Check out:

nostr:npub1706ejtxm88npppmg64plh5uy5y00cdcnpptp0m3gjvhtk9s5up7qxylh8d

Will inject some freshness into your aural experience nostr:note17jtczf3hxr7hl4ve5luvgapfafwgjq5u6qu2ly3fjhv7pnjmr3nqhwkjy4

I flipped you some sats and have been listening for a couple hours.

So refreshing to find someone on this platform with decent taste in music.

#v4v

The blue one or the one with the chilli pepper?

Replying to Avatar Ava

Lol. No.

And you called me delusional.

Biology is far more expansive than black and white, this or that, the sex is a boy or girl. A dick makes a man, a vaginal makes a woman.

Take intersex people (people born with ambiguous genitalia), for example. Those on this spectrum are about as common as people with red hair.

"Intersex is an umbrella term used to describe a wide range of natural variations that affect genitals, gonads, hormones, chromosomes, or reproductive organs. Sometimes these characteristics are visible at birth, sometimes they appear at puberty, and sometimes they are not physically apparent at all."

Historically, doctors have assigned intersex babies a gender at birth and performed mutilation surgeries based on appearance and size. This has led to doctors assigning the wrong sex based on nothing more than apoearance. People have committed suicide as a result of this genital mutilation.

"The Phall-O-Meter is a satirical representation of the way that clinicians have historically determined whether visibly intersex children should be assigned female (and subjected to feminizing surgeries) or assigned male (and subjected to masculinizing surgeries). It was created by the Intersex Society of North America, based on research by Susan Kessler (1998):

In general, medical standards do not allow clitorises larger than .9 centimeters (about 3/8 of an inch). … [An image showing ranges of medically acceptable infant clitoral and penile lengths reveals] that intermediate area of phallic length that neither females nor males are permitted to have."

I encourage you to do your own research into biology, sex, and gender. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about, yet you say it so confidently.

Have a good one.

An interesting etical question: