Avatar
Des Imoto マキシ
16897bfab409ff12a768217e14d472dd5e8a2ae11cc0e3340bf2d6f67f5bac83
Bitcoin is the only chance we have | Toxic Maxi | Anarchist | Voluntarist | #Bitcoin | #Plebchain

Why was Max Kaiser wobbly about the Tether question?

I think it’s totally ok to save your money. The point here is one around the integrity of Michael Saylor. He is using software/cognitive warfare techniques to manipulate. Bitcoin is money, not a commodity, it’s also not an investment, but can be saved. It replaces the fiat system and the USD. You should hold your own Keyes not give them to the banks. And, he uses other people’s money to acquire Bitcoin.

He has also, for a long time, advocated for the USD to remain the reserve currency, and pushed for Bitcoin to only being a store of value. He shape shifts language too, calling Bitcoin a commodity. When it acutely is money.

I don’t think Boeing as a company and the 737 as a plane are a good analogy. Neither would exist in a Bitcoin standard.

🚨NEW VIDEO🚨

Senator Lummis: #Bitcoin Is A COMMODITY

https://youtu.be/tBTKl811QsQ

- United States Senator nostr:npub15xqg2kz8qwy3gt3f04rjncyp4w9aludt2rgwhc30lfuftrm6d2msrd9rv7 joins the show to discuss Bitcoin and digital asset regulation

- Why Senator Lummis believes Bitcoin is a commodity

- Why there is so much momentum on understanding Bitcoin's correct classification

- The latest legislative efforts across stablecoins and illicit financing

Well, Bitcoin is not a commodity, since you can’t eat it, nor use it as a raw material. It’s, in fact money. She’s intentionally confusing people. Definitions of terms have become intentionally oblique. So that people don’t actually understand what money is. What is SoV, UoA, MoE vs investment, savings, community etc. She also wants to track you by taxing all transactions over $200. She’s an attack vector.

…; however, while the staring point may not be fair, #Bitcoin will always flow to the most value, to whom contributes the most. Due to Scarcity. If you don’t produce more value than you consume, you’ll spend more Bitcoin than you take in. So, in a Bitcoin standard world, it’ll eventually balance. Value, integrity, loyalty, community, beauty, art and architecture will become things again.

It seems the government could manipulate the #Bitcoin price in USD? Let’s say, through various entities, the own 20% of Bitcoin (or 10, whatever). They could just buy and sell Bitcoin at the desired price to themselves. While there me be slight losses through upward momentum induced by true market forces, they can cover that through printing money. Given the market cap of <$1T, it’s small compared to the stock market. Which essentially does the same thing, in a more complex system. Counter points?

Replying to Avatar Dylan LeClair

You'll often see charts or visuals illustrating the depreciation of the $USD over time, normalized to $1.00, of which I occasionally share myself.

However, there's an important caveat: these visuals rarely account for short-term yields. Displayed below is the purchasing power of $1, adjusting for annual CPI inflation (in red) versus the purchasing power of $1 accounting for 1-year Treasury yields less annual CPI inflation (in blue), starting from 1962

Notice anything?

The purchasing power of $1 from 1962 to the present equates to $1.85 when accounting for 1-year Treasury yields and inflation. Meanwhile, adjusting for inflation alone leaves you with just $0.10 of purchasing power.

Quite the massive difference.

However, there's more nuance to consider:

1) Let's separate the data into distinct eras,

From 1962 to start of 2009:

- Average annual inflation: 4.40%

- Average 1y yields: 6.22%

- Average difference: +1.82%

Real gains in purchasing power.

From 2009 to Present:

- Average annual inflation: 2.34%

- Average 1y yields: 1.00%

- Average difference: -1.34%

Real losses in purchasing power.

2) The data doesn't include the 1940s where financial repression massively devalued the USD to erode real debt burdens (the data I quickly threw together only went back to 1962) in the post war period.

3) Why 2009 for the change in eras? What has changed? If the U.S. can just pay a nominally higher yield than the inflation rate in perpetuity, are the fiat doomers really just delusional?

In my view:

- Positive real yields can be sustained with a clean balance sheet. It's feasible for the government to pay creditors a positive real interest rate when real debt burdens are low, demographics are booming, and the global GDP is exploding as the world industrializes.

- With Debt to GDP meaningfully > 100% and other tailwinds reversing, this is no longer the case. Post GFC and the introduction of ZIRP + QE to facilitate "growth", has the positive real yield era behind us, at least until real debt burdens have been eroded - which will take either explosive real growth, or a steady dose of inflation above yields, debasing creditors in the process.

The Bottom Line: The reality is that the average/median American individual or family often doesn't have much disposable income to capture such yields. The ones that do, benefit; and the ones that don't are the ones that pay for it.

When you look at charts showing record wealth disparity, or are wondering why the political landscape is more polarized than ever, keep this chart in mind.

Fiat inflation didn't bother the investor class from for forty years as yields outpaced inflation. Currency devaluation wasn't felt in the slightest by this cohort, they didn't just escape the devaluation, but outpaced it significantly.

Now, with Debt to GDP levels domestically and globally near record levels, expect the post 2009 dynamic to continue into the future on a longer time frame. Don't let the current tightening cycle fool you as to what must occur.

Inflation > Yields, over a sustained period of time, is the only way global governments can mask their insolvency.

Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

In reality one should also include productivity increases on the order of 6% per year through innovation and technology. That’s the hidden theft.

You wonder though. Since it’s pretty simple. Why, even under extreme circumstances like Venezuela, Lebanon, Argentina, Turkey, Cuba etc etc people don’t adopt it. What is it going to take?