19
334
1922aa1f876aac2c5539c5b67a7d3d98b2d4d8ab476c7d3eb528aca83bd0606e

Now when will we be able to sign a #liquid transaction with the #coldcard ;)

I appreciate your forthrightness.

I agree. Phoenix has a fixed fee of 0.4% for outbound lightning payments. I'd still like to see something a little less, but for a convenient self-custodial wallet for coffee use case, it's currently hard to beat. But at some higher price point, the Aqua fee rate falls below 0.4%. For example, I payed ~600000 sat invoice and Aqua's fee was less than 0.2%.

I recommend DCAing into #Liquid too. Then to main chain once enough for a good size utxo. Phoenix fees are too much (0.4%) if spending on lightning not a frequent need. Aqua, SideSwap, & Green are good options.

Bitcoin is many things. One is a system of aligned incentives. Whirlpool incentivises the holding of this massive and growing pool of bitcoin in hot, online, connected wallets indefinitely. This feels like a bad thing.

I would add #Liquid as a federated custody solution. #SideSwap works great, and now #AquaWallet is live with #Boltz built in.

Yes, it can. No need to be religious, #Lent is a good period for trying to abstain. MJ can help with tough spots (; Words I came across: alcohol steals happiness from tomorrow. Killing someone I care for deeply. Case of cheap whiskey handles <$100 );

I'm using #GraphineOS. Is there a way to download an apk so I don't have to use the google play store? Also, is Fountain closed source? If so, any plans to be open source in the future? I'm striving to use open source as much as possible, so right now it's #AntennaPod for me.

It's my understanding that #AquaWallet is #liquid & main chain based. There is no built in lightning channel. It likely does very well when using liquid to move lbtc & lusdt, and moving between main chain & liquid. But #PhoenixWallet is a lightning based wallet, and probably better for frequent, "routine" lightning payments. That said, Aqua is probably very good for "balancing" lightning funds in Phoenix by providing the ability to efficiently move between lightning & liquid (via #Boltz.exchange). Also if you're curious, check out #SideSwap.io too.

Replying to Avatar Peter Todd

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2024-January/022308.html

https://github.com/petertodd/bitcoin/tree/libre-relay-v26.0

tl;dr: I have a Libre Relay prototype available for testing. It does three things:

1. Removes the OP_Return limits.

2. Connects to an additional four Libre Relay nodes, to ensure transactions propagate.

2. Implements pure replace-by-fee-rate (RBFR) and full-rbf, to solve Rule #3 transaction pinning.

I'm already running it on a few mainnet and testnet nodes. The combination of #1 and #3 is interesting, because an objection to RBFR is it makes possible certain expensive DoS attacks. And #1 should piss off some people... So we'll see if the DoS attacks are serious enough that those pissed off people actually attack it. 😁

Background on RBFR: https://petertodd.org/2024/one-shot-replace-by-fee-rate

I have limited understanding of what is going on here, but am trying to learn more. I appreciate developers like yourself making it possible for less technical node runners like myself to exercise their right to "vote" by running the node software they choose. Thank you! Now for an option on my #Start9 (;