1d
Sam
1d3bb5e5a5e3e7db50a6fae6224b21e0c0a575b9227633ebd304e2e38c5d9df0
Accelerating bitcoin for institutions

What about fund managers with specific equity and bond mandates? Institutions could buy bitcoin before, although more friendly options (hopefully like SC will be) are a good thing. The bigger question is how does the monetary premium move from equity and bond markets to bitcoin?

I’ll send you a draft. Keen to hear your comments. TL;DR is that whilst there will be lots of froth (and some scams), there needs to be a path created for wealth to get from the equity and bond markets to Bitcoin. The big money cannot just sell and buy Bitcoin in self custody (although some of that will happen too).

I wrote an article on the plane home to try to tease out the nuances…

Picking up on nostr:nprofile1qqsp4lsvwn3aw7zwh2f6tcl6249xa6cpj2x3yuu6azaysvncdqywxmgprpmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuumwdae8gtnnda3kjctvqyvhwumn8ghj7ur4wfshv6tyvyhxummnw3ezumrpdejq4k23nj ‘s sharp take on BitBonds. They aren’t just the new junk bonds. They’re a confession of where fiat is headed.

The state needs convexity. Bitcoin provides it. BitBonds are the vehicle.

What starts as a workaround becomes a benchmark. Junk bonds did it. Mortgage-backed debt did it. BitBonds will too. if Bitcoin survives the volatility.

But this isn’t just about finance. It’s about nation states survival imo,

The fiat system is drowning in its own promises. Yields are rising. Buyers are disappearing. And BitBonds is a hybrid bond wrapped around Bitcoin. A last-ditch play to roll sovereign debt with digital collateral.

Here’s how it works: governments issue bonds with ultra-low coupons. 90% of the proceeds go to state spending. 10% buys Bitcoin. Investors get fixed income plus a piece of BTC upside. If Bitcoin rallies, it’s a convex windfall. If it collapses, governments still win: borrowing at a discount compared to traditional rates.

The pitch is seductive: “safe” Bitcoin exposure, no custody headaches, all within a regulated wrapper. Ideal for pension funds, family offices, and bureaucrats pretending they understand innovation.

But every financial product with asymmetric payoff begins the same way: hype, leverage, and someone eventually left holding the bag.

We’ve seen this movie: junk bonds in the ’80s, mortgage-backed securities in the 2000s, ESG debt in the 2010s. Each began as a workaround, not a solution. Each ended with a “correction” and survivors who shaped the next cycle.

If pilot programs succeed, BitBonds could hit $2T by 2030. They’ll reshape how governments borrow, how allocators think about #Bitcoin, and how systemic risk hides in plain sight.

#BitBonds are not a financial innovation. They’re a monetary confession. The dollar needs Bitcoin more than Bitcoin needs the dollar.

Watch what they do, not what they say.

nostr:nevent1qqsqepxunrwwvkscxpzpvu3t0c5tw5j6zzmjx8hpv4kpwapja5umylgz9td5e

Yes. Bitbonds are part of the transition to a bitcoin standard.

Yes, but you haven’t done the maths properly. She has only 32 teeth (approx) and she finds them very useful. So that works out to be at least 656,250 bitcoins per tooth! Or 0.0000015238095 of a tooth per bitcoin! Maybe she could tokenise her teeth?

Replying to Avatar Joe Nakamoto

GM!

I x-posted from twitter but I feel you guys will get it more.

Also I'm shilling nostr so you will like it.

🐻 🎤 A bugbear of mine is Bitcoiners misusing Gresham’s Law.

“Muuuh, Gresham’s Law” is not a valid excuse to keep spending dollars and never spend Bitcoin.

I get YouTube comments all the time like: “Only a fool spends their Bitcoin—it’s Gresham’s Law!”

Nope. Wrong. Gresham’s Law applies when two monies are accepted at a legally fixed rate.

That’s not the case here. Bitcoin and fiat float.

No one is forced to accept them at parity. So the law doesn’t apply.

Granted, it is technically "economically rational" to spend fiat over Bitcoin—especially if you’re not all-in, you don’t fully grok Bitcoin, or you only hold a tiny allocation. Or you're a dollar loving li'l b*tch who's only in it for fiat gains. (oops did i say that?)

But hoarding Bitcoin and spending fiat isn’t “Gresham’s Law in action.”

To me, it screams:

“I love paying Visa and Mastercard 3–7% in fees.”

“I love extending dollar hegemony.”

“I love being part of the problem.”

If you want a Bitcoin world—and trust me, you do, because you are currently HODLing btc—then at some point you have to spend it.

Want to live in a Bitcoin world? Put your money where your mouth is and ₿e part of the change.

So. How to start?

Download BTCmap to see where to spend btc near you, (do it—it's free), visit a bitcoin circular economy near you—promise you'll be blown away—check out Nostr where you can zap creators (easiest is to download Primal), send me btc on my website (hehe but srsly i'm independent and will thank you), check out Travala, ShopinBit, Bitrefill and many other online marketplaces that take bitcoin or bitcoin through gift cards.

And if you're going to a bitcoin event or conf, please pay in bitcoin for your tix. Satoshi thanks you in advance ✌️

Spot on! The answer is easy: everyone should go all in and spend bitcoin to kick start the circular economy.

A minor transitional tweak could be to only spend fiat on a credit card so that you are consistently negative fiat…

Presumably you mean Yorkshire playing Essex on the second day of their County Championship match? Can Yorkshire get a first innings lead? Looks like a good day for batting though.

This is the funny because in the UK doctors literally google stuff online in front of you! Good thing that the internet always knows the correct answer!

Replying to Avatar Frank Corva

My pleasure, nostr:nprofile1qqsr7acdvhf6we9fch94qwhpy0nza36e3tgrtkpku25ppuu80f69kfqpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgkwaehxw309ahx7um5wfjkc6t5v4ejummjvuhsepevmj

I disagree with Lutnick’s take on bitcoin as a commodity instead of a currency, as well. Unfortunately, in this interview, I was only allotted a certain amount of time, and I had other questions I wanted to ask. I didn’t have the time to get into it with him on this topic.

I also wanted to bring up the dangers of too much of a hashrate coming to the U.S., which I knew might be a dicey topic, so I had to choose my battle in this one.

Thank you for calling it out, though. We’ll need people to continue doing so until the likes of Sec. Lutnick change their mind.

Confusingly, arguably bitcoin is a “commodity money” if we extend Mises’ definition for a pure monetary asset. It’s not credit or fiat.

https://mises.org/online-book/theory-money-and-credit/chapter-3-various-kinds-money/3-commodity-money-credit-money-and-fiat-money

Ah, I see. You could change to football then. Cricket is a low time preference sport.