welcome to the club 🫂

Just a reminder: it's still my birthday 🎂 🥳 🎉 🎈 🎁 🎊 😂😂

So you’re stressing autonomous that the “members” or “participant” have little say on the organizing aspect except as swarm. Others seek to organize in an autonomous space that is horizontal. The CDC case you mentioned frowned on this organizing principle as organizations are defined with members that carry responsibility for their investments. The swarm organizing principle of Bitcoin is comprised of autonomous individuals more in line with market dynamics. I see a problem in using organization as a noun in this case.

Swarm dynamics would be decentralized autonomous organizing.

I suppose then DAO as organized entity rather than self-organizing entity still has some conceptual and legal work to do to come in line with current corporate, commerce and contract law.

It’s nice to see this divergence of principles innovating commerce and corporate entities in different ways.

Exciting times.

It might be more accurate to say you are a proponent of using acronyms for communication, otherwise you might have spelled out the words decentralized autonomous and organization.

Holy shit fish! That’s a huge stash. You must have a “guy”. I now carry steel straws in my car.

I would agree that bitcoin can be viewed as a type of DAO 🧠

Thank you for this thread. I’ve been wondering…

Interesting! I think people have lots of different definitions of DAO & none of them are truly decentralized. Will look into Typescript. 🤔

Why not just say Africa and Asia? "Global South" just means "poor countries" but said in a way that attempts to be politically correct but it's just dumb and broken.

Good morning ☕️☀️

Don’t forget how far you have come

Perfectly fine. Just flexing the expressive muscles after waking up.

This is a meditation exercise for us... Cleansing.

You haven't been sworn at until any type of Mediterranean European has shat on the whore of a mother who birthed you, on all your fucking dead ancestors and on Jesus Christ hanging from the Cross.

It is awful but I figure it is going to fail anyway. Why? Main stream social already all comes down to two dominant players (outside short form like tik tok and video like ScrewTube) it is already split between Shitter and FaceFuck. FackFuck is mostly boomers and older GenX, they like the long form shit, the communities, groups, marketplace, etc. Shitter is all people that like the micro blog format.

Most on them are there cuz politicians, celebrities, etc. are on them and not "social media influencers" who are more on InstaGram, TikTok, YouTube, etc. What I mean is those platforms have "native celebrities" meaning they were made on those platforms, a lot like podcasters. We have "fame" as podcasters built as podcasters. We are literally known for podcasting, not known people who also have a podcast.

FaceFuck instead has accounts by celebs made off platform, and the boomers family members are there too for sharing pics. Shitter has every governor, every former POTUS, every celeb, etc. People are there for the shit show. So how do you get people who want the shitter format off facefuck, the answer is you don't. How do you get them off shitter, the answer is, you don't they already have what they want. Threads is the answer to the question no one other than Zuc's marketing people asked.

So this thing is likely to be about as effective as when Google tried to beat facefucker with Google+. Remember Google+, no, no one does. Thats the point. Threads offers NOTHING new for FB users or Twitter users. It is a dead man walking and the real lesson is all that shit that Threads collects is the same shit all the fuckers are collecting already.

for that somebody to ask me how i do it

July to write grants, August to find a job, September to get my teeth fixed, October/November for naked yoga