Profile: 2a3006e4...

Interesting theory. Actually making it a registered security IS what proof of should be. No lying about decentralization or claiming it's money. The staking payout would be the equivalent of a taxable dividend issued by the company (exodus). But that is only if it's own blockchain and not built on top of another shitcoin.

Replying to Avatar fiatjaf

nostr:npub15879mltlln6k8jy32k6xvagmtqx3zhsndchcey8gjyectwldk88sq5kv0n have you noticed that you have 21k followers on Twitter but your posts there get 300 views, 1 reply on average? You should try to give Elon a big amount of money plus do a heavy KYC to see if you start to get more from that platform.

He's talked about it before.

What is the point? All it does is delay devs. I don't think testnets are designed to be the ultimate attack resistant tech. Is he expecting testnets to become monetized to try and prevent attack? Just seems like a pointless dick move.

I have a #Bitcoin    conference ticket for sale. Won't be able to make it this year. They are $499 right now will sell for $350

I haven't got a chance to use this yet. Are there services/ways to access (thru someone else running a LN node?) Cashu if you aren't running LN node?

Got my 1st piece of #bitcoinart! The last in stock I believe :)

Check out nostr:npub1mfndvgwstwm604jvrt07p6nyy898mdsdzzyumx9sdn8u6r4za4uqck6f8v if you haven't

n

So apparently Bitcoin Mag is now publishing pro Ethereum articles. They are transitioning back to a crypto mag and not a bitcoin mag. Sad. But not surprising as it seems they only went Bitcoin only to stand out marketing wise. Not because they believe Bitcoin is unique from cRYpTo.

Anyone have any vague idea what the hong kong BTC ETF inflows will be compared to the volumes brought by the US ETF approval?? After a month of 2 will they be roughly 60% of US inflows? 30%? 10%?

Haven't heard much hype for it.

#Bitcoin

Seems streamlining of many functions if the holdup IMO. For instance, until I do more research relays are pain in my ass. I added 30, maybe 13 work. My posts dont reach anyone hardly. Most users won't want to learn this. Users don't want to do ANY research. They will just want them to be there when they join, and work, without thinking about it or any management.

Replying to Avatar f0xr

Just posted an article on UBI, giving my comments and criticism on nostr:npub1fpcd25q2zg09rp65fglxuhp0acws5qlphpg88un7mdcskygdvgyqfv4sld episode with Scott Santens. Big shout-out to nostr:npub164q45vfa8prpl7f63stsl9qm9n22v6julkasjdqxjc8kevchsj0sp42rl3 and nostr:npub12lzwey2hjc2ce0stwa3ldhg04h93wj263lvdhrf87qfzz9jsggeqwuntw2 for tackling a topic they know will get a lot of criticism from the Bitcoin community! Agree or disagree, I respect anyone who voices their opinion, and appreciate the effort they put into the show.

Check out the article, and give the episode a listen. And subscribe to their podcast, because even if you don't agree, there's nothing more boring and intellectually cowardly than living in an echo chamber. I'd love to hear your feedback in the comments! And if you want to see my future articles, consider subscribing to my Substack. I don't promote it anywhere outside Nostr, so your support means a lot.

https://open.substack.com/pub/f0xr/p/universal-basic-income-coercion-or?r=3i492j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Yup. Pretty easy take down if one considers math or reality. Good article

Replying to Avatar ShiShi21m

Bitcoiners annihilated nostr:npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp over using current marketing dynamics by pandering to the "diversity" hiring schema.

Incredibly stupid & shortsighted response by supposed high IQ people.

The hive managed to target someone who was respectfully helping people self custody their Bitcoins.

The company just wasn't "pure enough" for them - this is Marxism!

People claim to be above the herd, but man that was a dumb hill to defend.

Who the fuck cares how people hire & market their companies from that perspective? If you wanna do that - go for it.

Free market of hiring dynamics...or nah?

I could care less about whatever hiring dynamics he has. But when you promote tokens that undo all the things bitcoin fixes and whose vcs/foundations actively attack/market against btc, it comes off as only being in Bitcoin for profit vs a belief in it. Also he is entitled to his opinion but his stance of move fast, sling things against the wall and see what sticks and what breaks when it comes to changing btc code is kinda shitcoiny/an attack IMO.