We have to wait for protocol development and specially better clients.
Best book of the 20th century
Claro. es exactamente eso.
El problema que me complica la UX es que prefiero ver un poco más de aquellos que postean menos y menos de los que postean más.
My Nostr feed is 80% #[0].
I dunno know if I should follow a lot of more people or if Gigi is Nostring too much 🤔
Sure. But being non democratic is of utmost importance for me. Otherwise the system could change if a democratic majority decides to change it.
I've seen too many times what happens to democratic systems.
Spoiler: it ain't nice, specially for minorities.
It's VERY far from Democracy and also of being democratic.
You don't vote shit. Noderunners just decide to participate in network or not participate. And you can tweak your node as u please. With certain parameter for example u end up using BCH.
In all cases there is ZERO voting.
Bitcoin is 100% based on consent while democracy is based on coercion from the majority over everyone else.
"Moderation in all things, including moderation, is a virtue to which only mediocrity can aspire. Fanaticism or indifference are the only forms of devotion that can survive in the face of disaster."
Ayn R.
I know the intentions are good and all, but Bitcoin is clearly non democratic.
Some may even say anti-democratic.
And is changing the essence of the Government in a radical way.
So, my question is:
why do some bitcoiners still believe in democratic institutions? Do you really think that reaching to the politicians with solid arguments such as the ones in the book will make a dent in their nefarious system?
🇦🇷Argentina in 2 minutes
youtu.be/mZPR7sNFmvI
#tourism #Bitcoin #Citadel
#freedom #nature #BEEF
freecitiesargentina.alephcitadel.com
And the really scary part is that in some SHTF scenarios the bitcoins you actually own with their pks may not even have any use at all. 😬
#survivalism